Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add azurerm_data_protection_backup_instance_kubernetes_cluster feature #822

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

drew0ps
Copy link
Contributor

@drew0ps drew0ps commented Sep 18, 2024

Description of your changes

This simple change adds support for the resource azurerm_data_protection_backup_instance_kubernetes_cluster.

Fixes #

I have:

  • Read and followed Crossplane's contribution process.
  • Run make reviewable to ensure this PR is ready for review.
  • Local tests with make e2e passed
  • Pipeline uptests passed
  • [N/A] Added backport release-x.y labels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.

How has this code been tested

Signed-off-by: drew0ps <ad.marton@proton.me>
…ion and sane naming.

Signed-off-by: drew0ps <ad.marton@proton.me>
@drew0ps drew0ps changed the title Add aks backup instance Add azurerm_data_protection_backup_instance_kubernetes_cluster feature Sep 18, 2024
@drew0ps
Copy link
Contributor Author

drew0ps commented Sep 18, 2024

/test-examples="examples/dataprotection/v1beta1/backupinstancekubernetescluster.yaml"

@drew0ps
Copy link
Contributor Author

drew0ps commented Sep 23, 2024

/test-examples="examples/dataprotection/v1beta1/backupinstancekubernetescluster.yaml"

Copy link
Collaborator

@turkenf turkenf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @drew0ps, LGTM.

@turkenf turkenf merged commit 351146e into crossplane-contrib:main Sep 23, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants