Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: latest v0.44 SDK is not used #643

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2021

Conversation

tomtau
Copy link
Contributor

@tomtau tomtau commented Sep 2, 2021

Solution: bumped SDK + upgraded Go to 1.17

Solution: bumped SDK + upgraded Go to 1.17
@tomtau
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomtau commented Sep 2, 2021

/runsim

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2021

Simulation tests started and triggered by /runsim.
Will update here when it succeeds or fails.
Can further check progress here

@@ -26,6 +26,103 @@ require (

)

require (
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is generated when I ran go mod tidy https://golang.org/doc/go1.17

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the go command to correctly resolve transitive imports using the pruned module graph, the go.mod file for each module needs to include more detail about the transitive dependencies relevant to that module. If a module specifies go 1.17 or higher in its go.mod file, its go.mod file now contains an explicit require directive for every module that provides a transitively-imported package. (In previous versions, the go.mod file typically only included explicit requirements for directly-imported packages.)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #643 (0953ab0) into master (ff47723) will increase coverage by 12.55%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #643       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    9.77%   22.32%   +12.55%     
===========================================
  Files          36       70       +34     
  Lines        5721     8131     +2410     
===========================================
+ Hits          559     1815     +1256     
- Misses       5072     5776      +704     
- Partials       90      540      +450     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration_tests 18.97% <ø> (?)
unit_tests 9.77% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
x/nft/keeper/invariants.go 3.92% <0.00%> (-46.08%) ⬇️
x/nft/keeper/querier.go 8.67% <0.00%> (-31.33%) ⬇️
x/nft/types/msgs.go 48.14% <0.00%> (-16.86%) ⬇️
x/nft/client/rest/tx.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/nft/client/cli/flags.go 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/nft/types/events.go 80.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/supply/keeper/grpc_query.go 50.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/supply/types/genesis.pb.go 1.51% <0.00%> (ø)
x/supply/types/genesis.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/nft/module.go 60.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 46 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff47723...0953ab0. Read the comment docs.

go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
@tomtau
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomtau commented Sep 2, 2021

for the dependency stuff: #618

Copy link
Collaborator

@yihuang yihuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/runsim simulation test has succeeded 🎉
Can further check here

@tomtau tomtau merged commit 7abe2e1 into crypto-org-chain:master Sep 2, 2021
tomtau added a commit to tomtau/chain-main that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
Problem: latest v0.44 SDK is not used (crypto-org-chain#643)

Solution: bumped SDK + upgraded Go to 1.17

* mark offline signing test to be temporarily ignored

Problem: golang-cross 1.17 is not yet on dockerhub (crypto-org-chain#645)

Solution: revert back to 1.16
tomtau added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2021
Problem: latest v0.44 SDK is not used (#643)

Solution: bumped SDK + upgraded Go to 1.17

* mark offline signing test to be temporarily ignored

Problem: golang-cross 1.17 is not yet on dockerhub (#645)

Solution: revert back to 1.16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants