Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create yo #1

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Create yo #1

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

SL34K
Copy link

@SL34K SL34K commented Nov 8, 2020

Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.

Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Ion Core user experience or Ion Core developer experience
significantly.

  • Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  • All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see src/test/) or
    functional tests (see test/). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  • Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  • Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Ion Core, if possible.
  • Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they significantly improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the developer notes, stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.

Ion Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.

@SL34K
Copy link
Author

SL34K commented Nov 8, 2020

@cryptolinux unblock me on discord

cryptolinux pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2021
…tion

d31e5c1 Fix shutdown in case of errors during initialization (Wladimir J. van der Laan)

Pull request description:

  PR bitcoin#10286 introduced a few steps which are not robust to early shutdown in initialization.

  Stumbled upon this with bitcoin#11781, not sure if there are other scenarios that can trigger it, but it's good to harden against this in any case.

  E.g.
  ```
  $ src/bitcoind  -debuglogfile=/dfdf
  Error: Could not open debug log file /dfdf
  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  UnregisterValidationInterface (pwalletIn=0x0) at /.../bitcoin/src/validationinterface.cpp:82
  82          g_signals.m_internals->BlockChecked.disconnect(boost::bind(&CValidationInterface::BlockChecked, pwalletIn, _1, _2));
  (gdb) bt
  #0  UnregisterValidationInterface (pwalletIn=0x0) at /.../bitcoin/src/validationinterface.cpp:82
  #1  0x00005555555a11fc in Shutdown () at /.../bitcoin/src/init.cpp:196
  #2  0x00005555555961cc in AppInit (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /.../bitcoin/src/bitcoind.cpp:183
  #3  0x0000555555596249 in main (argc=0, argv=0x555555ecf200) at /.../bitcoin/src/bitcoind.cpp:19
  ```

Tree-SHA512: 7dd9570a9803514a17781bfadf1edde47e96df4e852cce2f423cab422e005fb94d44e777af1a6ea5167b04a4d889e848ae7a61a7e0e94232247ddea32ee70fc8
cryptolinux pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2021
cryptolinux pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants