Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add cell selection type #246

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 23, 2021
Merged

Add cell selection type #246

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 23, 2021

Conversation

pokey
Copy link
Member

@pokey pokey commented Aug 20, 2021

Comment on lines +18 to +19
# %%
print("hello")
Copy link
Member Author

@pokey pokey Aug 20, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whoops. looks like (shockingly) the jupyter.insertCellAbove command returns a promise that resolves before the action is actually complete, so test recorder shows nothing having changed. awesome. so do we keep the test to just make sure nothing errors, delete the test, or insert some random sleep? cc/ @AndreasArvidsson @brxck

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wtf they dont ubderstand how a promise work do they?
I dont really care since we cant actually test it.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yikes. If it were up to me I would leave the test as is with a note. I don't think it's worth it to accommodate with a sleep, we're never going to be 100% tests anyhow.

@pokey pokey added this to the 0.22.0 milestone Aug 20, 2021
@pokey pokey merged commit 518683f into master Aug 23, 2021
@pokey pokey deleted the add-cell-selection-type branch August 23, 2021 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants