-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include generic in java type definition #372
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ | |||
languageId: java |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not worth rewriting all these tests, but I thought we had aligned on "clear" instead of "take" to make these tests easier to read. Makes it a bit painful having to manually count offsets to figure out what the test is doing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're completely correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fwiw I'm planning a rework of the tests to make modifier tests clearer / more compact, and then the "clear" / "take" thing won't matter. Not sure if I've already filed an issue but I will at some point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that sounds really useful
No description provided.