-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[GSoC2024] - fix/attribute-text-length-limited-for-adding-values #7761
[GSoC2024] - fix/attribute-text-length-limited-for-adding-values #7761
Conversation
Do you have any comments to the pull request? |
@coderabbitai review |
WalkthroughThe recent system update has doubled the maximum length of attribute values, enabling more extensive data storage and annotations system-wide. Changes
Poem
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional Context UsedLanguageTool (1)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
changelog.d/20240413_031652_ritikraj2699_attribute_text_length_limited_for_adding_values.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…_limited_for_adding_values.md Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Can you please review it? |
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ class AttributeSpec(models.Model): | |||
input_type = models.CharField(max_length=16, | |||
choices=AttributeType.choices()) | |||
default_value = models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=128) | |||
values = models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=4096) | |||
values = models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=8192) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably, it is not a good solution to increase the limit here and use CharField
. Since we're using PostgreSQL, there shouldn't be any problems with wasting memory when the values
field is small, but... Perhaps it will be better to use TextField
here and add a limit in the code (but not to the values
field since we store a list with attribute values in a string with a custom separator) - introduce an upper limit on the max number of characters for an attribute value and max number of attributes. + This looks logical to me also because we have a limit for AttributeVal.value
.
Doubled the maximum length of the attribute values.
Motivation and context
It provides a solution to the issue here
How has this been tested?
Checklist
develop
branch- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary(cvat-canvas,
cvat-core,
cvat-data and
cvat-ui)
License
Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
Summary by CodeRabbit