Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed server code 500 -> 400 when user input is not correct #8280

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 8, 2024

Conversation

bsekachev
Copy link
Member

@bsekachev bsekachev commented Aug 8, 2024

Motivation and context

How to reproduce: send automatic annotation request for a skeleton without specifying any sublabels, e.g:

image

image

How has this been tested?

Checklist

  • I submit my changes into the develop branch
  • I have created a changelog fragment
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • I have linked related issues (see GitHub docs)
  • I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary
    (cvat-canvas,
    cvat-core,
    cvat-data and
    cvat-ui)

License

  • I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project.
    Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced validation for skeleton type mappings, ensuring that sublabels are provided when needed.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Introduced error handling to prevent further validation issues caused by missing sublabel mappings.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This change enhances the validate_attributes_mapping function by introducing a validation check for skeleton types. It ensures that a mapping item includes a 'sublabels' key when both md_label and db_label are categorized as 'skeleton'. This stricter validation helps maintain data integrity by preventing potential mapping errors before they occur.

Changes

Files Change Summary
cvat/apps/lambda_manager/views.py Added validation to validate_attributes_mapping to check for 'sublabels' key in skeleton-type mappings.

Poem

In the code where rabbits roam,
A check was made to guard our home.
With sublabels now in sight,
Skeletons dance in pure delight.
Hopping through mappings, we ensure,
That all is right and nothing obscure! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 478f670 and 39eb5fc.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • cvat/apps/lambda_manager/views.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
cvat/apps/lambda_manager/views.py (1)

346-350: Verify the new validation logic for skeleton sublabels.

The validation logic ensures that sublabels are present for skeleton types. This is a good enhancement for data integrity. However, verify that this change does not introduce any unintended side effects or exceptions in other parts of the codebase that rely on this function.

Verification successful

New validation logic for skeleton sublabels verified.

The validate_labels_mapping function, which includes the new validation logic for skeleton sublabels, is called in a consistent context within the same file. There are no indications of unintended side effects in other parts of the codebase. The change appears to be safe and well-contained.

  • Calls to validate_labels_mapping are found in cvat/apps/lambda_manager/views.py.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the new validation logic for skeleton sublabels.

# Test: Search for all calls to `validate_labels_mapping`. Expect: Ensure that all calls handle the new validation logic properly.
rg --type python -A 5 $'validate_labels_mapping'

Length of output: 78


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the new validation logic for skeleton sublabels.

# Test: Search for all calls to `validate_labels_mapping`. Expect: Ensure that all calls handle the new validation logic properly.
rg --type py -A 5 'validate_labels_mapping'

Length of output: 1511

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 8, 2024

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.36%. Comparing base (478f670) to head (3988a30).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #8280      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    83.36%   83.36%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          390      390              
  Lines        41549    41551       +2     
  Branches      3860     3860              
===========================================
+ Hits         34637    34638       +1     
- Misses        6912     6913       +1     
Components Coverage Δ
cvat-ui 79.64% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
cvat-server 86.66% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

@bsekachev bsekachev merged commit 79ec6a1 into develop Aug 8, 2024
33 checks passed
@bsekachev bsekachev deleted the bs/fixed_server_code branch August 9, 2024 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants