[GSoC'24] Keyboard Shortcuts Customization, Cypress Tests #8343
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
tahamukhtar20
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- cvat-ui/src/components/header/settings-modal/shortcut-settings.tsx (3 hunks)
- tests/cypress/e2e/features/shortcuts.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- cvat-ui/src/components/header/settings-modal/shortcut-settings.tsx
Additional comments not posted (9)
tests/cypress/e2e/features/shortcuts.js (9)
1-6: LGTM!The file header and reference types are correctly included.
7-21: LGTM!The context block and constants are correctly defined.
22-57: LGTM!The task and storage objects are correctly defined.
59-68: LGTM!The before hook is correctly implemented.
96-101: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented.
124-126: LGTM!The after hook is correctly implemented.
70-94: Reduce usage of.ant-classes.The function is correctly implemented but uses
.ant-classes. It is better to add uniquecvat-classes to different elements.-const searchItemClass = search === 'description' ? '.cvat-shortcuts-settings-item-title' : '.cvat-shortcuts-settings-item-description'; +const searchItemClass = search === 'description' ? '.cvat-shortcuts-settings-item-title' : '.cvat-shortcuts-settings-item-description';Likely invalid or redundant comment.
128-137: Reduce usage of.ant-classes.The test cases are correctly implemented but use
.ant-classes. It is better to add uniquecvat-classes to different elements.-cy.get('.cvat-shortcuts-settings-search input').should('exist').and('be.visible'); +cy.get('.cvat-shortcuts-settings-search input').should('exist').and('be.visible');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
140-153: Reduce usage of.ant-classes.The test case is correctly implemented but uses
.ant-classes. It is better to add uniquecvat-classes to different elements.-cy.get('.cvat-shortcuts-settings-collapse').should('exist').and('be.visible'); +cy.get('.cvat-shortcuts-settings-collapse').should('exist').and('be.visible');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #8343 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 83.47% 83.56% +0.08%
===========================================
Files 396 396
Lines 41830 41830
Branches 3881 3881
===========================================
+ Hits 34919 34954 +35
+ Misses 6911 6876 -35
|
Motivation and context
How has this been tested?
Checklist
developbranch(cvat-canvas,
cvat-core,
cvat-data and
cvat-ui)
License
Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation