-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Find nearby cycle points without iterating from sequence start #1053
Milestone
Comments
This is causing some problems, so I'd like to address this in the next couple of weeks. |
benfitzpatrick
added a commit
to benfitzpatrick/cylc
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2016
benfitzpatrick
added a commit
to benfitzpatrick/cylc
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2016
benfitzpatrick
added a commit
to benfitzpatrick/cylc
that referenced
this issue
May 31, 2016
@benfitzpatrick - should this be closed now, or do you think we can still do better in the future? (in #1850 you wrote "This addresses part of #1053".) |
I think we can close it - as it's written, it's addressed by #1850. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In several places in the new ISO8601 cycling implementation we find an on-sequence point at or near to some other point X by iterating from the sequence start point until at or beyond X. This is not efficient if X is a long way beyond the sequence start point. It should be (I hope) possible to find a nearby on-sequence more directly, like in the old (otherwise vastly inferior!) cycling modules. See #1044 (comment), #1044 (comment), and #1044 (comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: