Document spawn to max active cycle points. #2047
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hjoliver
requested changes
Oct 14, 2016
| {\em Important:} This should be used with care given the potential impact of | ||
| additional task proxies both in terms of memory and cpu for the cylc daemon as | ||
| well as overheads in rendering all the additional tasks in gcylc. Also, use | ||
| of the setting may highlight any deficiencies in graphing dependent on the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you make it clearer that this is a suite design error, i.e. that the suite writer has implicitly relied on the spawn-on-submit behaviour. "Deficiencies in graphing" sounds like it could be another reference to rendering overheads or something (for the extra task proxies).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tweaked to be a suite design issue rather than graphing deficiency. No idea why the above doesn't adjust though,
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Equivalent to #2042 for 6.11.x branch
@hjoliver - please review