-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: scaffold commands file #20398
Merged
estrada9166
merged 8 commits into
10.0-release
from
alejandro/fix/scaffold-commands-file
Mar 2, 2022
Merged
fix: scaffold commands file #20398
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ea81926
fix: scaffold commnands file
estrada9166 4c512df
Merge branch '10.0-release' into alejandro/fix/scaffold-commands-file
estrada9166 27f4bf6
Merge branch '10.0-release' into alejandro/fix/scaffold-commands-file
estrada9166 45438f2
Merge branch '10.0-release' into alejandro/fix/scaffold-commands-file
estrada9166 38870fc
Update with code review
estrada9166 0fe2bf4
Update with command types
estrada9166 1d789c7
Merge branch '10.0-release' into alejandro/fix/scaffold-commands-file
estrada9166 f69bb94
Merge branch '10.0-release' into alejandro/fix/scaffold-commands-file
estrada9166 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we take this chance to add some tests to actually verify the file is created on the filesystem? These tests just verify we show the file we will create in the UI, not that they are actually written.
We have a pattern for this, see this function: https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/blob/10.0-release/packages/launchpad/cypress/e2e/scaffold-component-testing.cy.ts#L11-L19 . This one actually verifies the content, too (might be worth doing something similar here?)
I also notice the
support/component.ts
contains// TODO
- might be worth finding out what needs to go here and adding that, too? What do you think?