Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update pipeline #163

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 13, 2021
Merged

update pipeline #163

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 13, 2021

Conversation

michaelbornholdt
Copy link
Contributor

modified from EmbeddedArtistry

Description

Updating the pipeline image after working on a new version for the LINCS repo.

What is the nature of your change?

  • Bug fix (fixes an issue).
  • Enhancement (adds functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).
  • This change requires a documentation update.

Checklist

Please ensure that all boxes are checked before indicating that a pull request is ready for review.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have deleted all non-relevant text in this pull request template.

@michaelbornholdt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@niranjchandrasekaran Can you accept this. Or comment on the image if you want it changed.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 20, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #163 (fb7015b) into master (372f108) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #163      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.09%   98.07%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          49       52       +3     
  Lines        2253     2441     +188     
==========================================
+ Hits         2210     2394     +184     
- Misses         43       47       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 98.07% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pycytominer/cyto_utils/cells.py 96.26% <0.00%> (-0.77%) ⬇️
pycytominer/tests/test_cyto_utils/test_util.py 96.89% <0.00%> (-0.40%) ⬇️
pycytominer/annotate.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pycytominer/aggregate.py 96.77% <0.00%> (ø)
pycytominer/normalize.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pycytominer/cyto_utils/__init__.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pycytominer/operations/__init__.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pycytominer/tests/test_feature_select.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pycytominer/operations/variance_threshold.py 97.05% <0.00%> (ø)
pycytominer/tests/test_cyto_utils/test_modz.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 10 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 372f108...fb7015b. Read the comment docs.

@niranjchandrasekaran
Copy link
Member

@michaelbornholdt The old figure shows all the things that could be done using pycytominer (the figure will need to be updated once the Ruifan's feature selection methods are added) while the new figure is specific to how the LINCS dataset was processed. Is there a reason why you want to replace the general pipeline with the LINCS specific pipeline in this repo?

@michaelbornholdt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah yes. You're totally right. I need to change that again then!

@michaelbornholdt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@niranjchandrasekaran @gwaygenomics
Please look at this new image. It has been updated in accord to the one in the lincs repo

@gwaybio
Copy link
Member

gwaybio commented Oct 6, 2021

  • I think you need to add Ruifan's method still
  • Shouldn't data level 4bs also funnel to cytominer-eval?

@michaelbornholdt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dont know what is meant by Ruifans method.

And yes, I can link 4bs to cyto eval as well.

@gwaybio
Copy link
Member

gwaybio commented Oct 7, 2021

@ruifanp's method "noise_removal" added in #153 - please add it to the feature seleection method options

@michaelbornholdt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gwaygenomics Done now

@gwaybio
Copy link
Member

gwaybio commented Oct 13, 2021

perfect, i'll merge

@gwaybio gwaybio merged commit 9af0b4b into master Oct 13, 2021
@gwaybio gwaybio deleted the update_workflow branch October 13, 2021 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants