docs: update CITATION.cff and pyproject.toml authors

[kenibrewer]

Description

This change updates the author list contained in the CITATION.cff for the pycytominer publication. It also updates the authors and maintainer list in the pyproject.toml.

Closes #316

What is the nature of your change?

• Bug fix (fixes an issue).

Checklist

Please ensure that all boxes are checked before indicating that a pull request is ready for review.

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
• My changes generate no new warnings.
• I have deleted all non-relevant text in this pull request template.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #339 (02d17d4) into main (afe5df3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #339   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.40%   95.40%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines        3134     3134           
=======================================
  Hits         2990     2990           
  Misses        144      144           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	95.40% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[kenibrewer]

@gwaybio I haven't updated the authors list in the pyproject.toml yet. There are a few questions I'd like some guidance on because I'm not sure if the norms for pyproject.toml authors differs from academic publications. I can't find any online guidance online, so I presume we can do whatever we want here.

1. Do we include the full list of authors from the CITATION.cff or only a subset?
2. Do we include email address for all the authors listed or only a subset (e.g. maintainers and corresponding authors)?
3. Do we use the same ordering of authors here as for the publication or some alternate order?

In case you want to suggest changes for that author list yourself, I'll email you a txt file with the properly formatted author list with everyone's emails. I just wanted to be careful to not add any email address to a repo unless they will be staying there. I'm also happy to take care of it, if you'd like to just respond to the questions.

[gwaybio]

Thanks @kenibrewer - this PR is perfect timing.

Responses

Do we include the full list of authors from the CITATION.cff or only a subset?

Let's include all. After the paper is published it will become the default citation. Do you know what happens with the CITATION.cff file after? Maybe it just points to the paper DOI?

Do we include email address for all the authors listed or only a subset (e.g. maintainers and corresponding authors)?

I think we should avoid adding any additional contact details. We want to encourage public engagement (via issues/PRs/etc.) and we have a CONTRIBUTING.md that specifies a contact for sensitive matters.

Do we use the same ordering of authors here as for the publication or some alternate order?

Let's keep things simple and maintain the same order.

Additional question

I'm also wondering how a poetry-style repo should handle the __about__.py file. Do you have any recommendations?

I want to avoid the situation of needing to bump versions in multiple spots manually.

[kenibrewer]

@gwaybio This is ready for review.

I'm also wondering how a poetry-style repo should handle the about.py file. Do you have any recommendations?

I actually already have this feature already implemented in a different PR that dave is reviewing. 😊