Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 23, 2024. It is now read-only.

Fixes #3723 - Fix validation of duplicate volume names #3737

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 12, 2016
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -115,24 +115,39 @@ private[impl] object DVDIProviderValidations extends ExternalVolumeValidations {
// task instance across the entire cluster.
override lazy val rootGroup = new Validator[Group] {
override def apply(g: Group): Result = {
val appsByVolume =
val appsByVolume: Map[String, Set[PathId]] =
g.transitiveApps
.flatMap { app => namesOfMatchingVolumes(app).map(_ -> app.id) }
.groupBy { case (volumeName, _) => volumeName }
.mapValues(_.map { case (volumeName, appId) => appId })

val groupViolations = g.apps.flatMap { app =>
val ruleViolations = namesOfMatchingVolumes(app).flatMap { name =>
for {
otherApp <- appsByVolume(name)
if otherApp != app.id // do not compare to self
} yield RuleViolation(app.id, s"Requested volume $name conflicts with a volume in app $otherApp", None)
val appValid: Validator[AppDefinition] = {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The g.apps instead of g.transitiveApps prevented validation of apps in nested groups.

def volumeNameUnique(appId: PathId): Validator[ExternalVolume] = {
def conflictingApps(vol: ExternalVolume): Set[PathId] =
appsByVolume.getOrElse(vol.external.name, Set.empty).filter(_ != appId)

isTrue { (vol: ExternalVolume) =>
val conflictingAppIds = conflictingApps(vol).mkString(", ")
s"Volume name '${vol.external.name}' in $appId conflicts with volume(s) of same name in app(s): " +
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's fix the path, and make the description simple.
The conflictingApps function can be moved inside the isTrue block.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure what is best there. I'll keep it "as is". We can improve it later.

s"$conflictingAppIds"
}{ vol => conflictingApps(vol).isEmpty }
}

validator[AppDefinition] { app =>
app.externalVolumes is every(volumeNameUnique(app.id))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To have the correct path here, you can do:

app.externalVolumes as "container/volumes" is every(volumeNameUnique(app.id))

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then the index is wrong

Matthias Veit notifications@github.com schrieb am Di., 12. Apr. 2016
08:12:

In
src/main/scala/mesosphere/marathon/core/externalvolume/impl/providers/DVDIProvider.scala
#3737 (comment):

  •        if otherApp != app.id // do not compare to self
    
  •      } yield RuleViolation(app.id, s"Requested volume $name conflicts with a volume in app $otherApp", None)
    
  •  val appValid: Validator[AppDefinition] = {
    
  •    def volumeNameUnique(appId: PathId): Validator[ExternalVolume] = {
    
  •      def conflictingApps(vol: ExternalVolume): Set[PathId] =
    
  •        appsByVolume.getOrElse(vol.external.name, Set.empty).filter(_ != appId)
    
  •      isTrue { (vol: ExternalVolume) =>
    
  •        val conflictingAppIds = conflictingApps(vol).mkString(", ")
    
  •        s"Volume name '${vol.external.name}' in $appId conflicts with volume(s) of same name in app(s): " +
    
  •          s"$conflictingAppIds"
    
  •      }{ vol => conflictingApps(vol).isEmpty }
    
  •    }
    
  •    validator[AppDefinition] { app =>
    
  •      app.externalVolumes is every(volumeNameUnique(app.id))
    

To have the correct path here, you can do:

app.externalVolumes as "container/volumes" is every(volumeNameUnique(app.id))


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/mesosphere/marathon/pull/3737/files/8795607fb366bab5b1537cf741f15c6478c3aede#r59325005

}
if (ruleViolations.isEmpty) None
else Some(GroupViolation(app, "app contains conflicting volumes", None, ruleViolations.toSet))
}
group(groupViolations)

def groupValid: Validator[Group] = validator[Group] { group =>
group.apps is every(appValid)
group.groups is every(groupValid)
}

// We need to call the validators recursively such that the "description" of the rule violations
// is correctly calculated.
groupValid(g)
}

}

override lazy val app = {
Expand Down
37 changes: 17 additions & 20 deletions src/main/scala/mesosphere/marathon/state/Group.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -211,8 +211,18 @@ object Group {
def defaultDependencies: Set[PathId] = Set.empty
def defaultVersion: Timestamp = Timestamp.now()

private def validNestedGroup(base: PathId): Validator[Group] =
validator[Group] { group =>
def validRootGroup(maxApps: Option[Int]): Validator[Group] = {
case object doesNotExceedMaxApps extends Validator[Group] {
override def apply(group: Group): Result = {
maxApps.filter(group.transitiveApps.size > _).map { num =>
Failure(Set(RuleViolation(group,
s"""This Marathon instance may only handle up to $num Apps!
|(Override with command line option --max_apps)""".stripMargin, None)))
} getOrElse Success
}
}

def validNestedGroup(base: PathId): Validator[Group] = validator[Group] { group =>
group.id is validPathWithBase(base)
group.apps is every(AppDefinition.validNestedAppDefinition(group.id.canonicalPath(base)))
group is noAppsAndGroupsWithSameName
Expand All @@ -221,24 +231,11 @@ object Group {
group.groups is every(valid(validNestedGroup(group.id.canonicalPath(base))))
}

implicit val validRootGroup: Validator[Group] = new Validator[Group] {
override def apply(group: Group): Result = {
group is ExternalVolumes.validRootGroup
validate(group)(validator =
validNestedGroup(PathId.empty))
}
}

def validGroupWithConfig(maxApps: Option[Int])(implicit validator: Validator[Group]): Validator[Group] = {
new Validator[Group] {
override def apply(group: Group): Result = {
maxApps.filter(group.transitiveApps.size > _).map { num =>
Failure(Set(RuleViolation(group,
s"""This Marathon instance may only handle up to $num Apps!
|(Override with command line option --max_apps)""".stripMargin, None)))
} getOrElse Success
} and validator(group)
}
// We do not want a "/value" prefix, therefore we do not create nested validators with validator[Group]
// but chain the validators directly.
doesNotExceedMaxApps and
validNestedGroup(PathId.empty) and
ExternalVolumes.validRootGroup()
}

private def noAppsAndGroupsWithSameName: Validator[Group] =
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ class GroupManager @Inject() (
from <- rootGroup()
(toUnversioned, resolve) <- resolveStoreUrls(assignDynamicServicePorts(from, change(from)))
to = GroupVersioningUtil.updateVersionInfoForChangedApps(version, from, toUnversioned)
_ = validateOrThrow(to)(Group.validGroupWithConfig(config.maxApps.get))
_ = validateOrThrow(to)(Group.validRootGroup(config.maxApps.get))
plan = DeploymentPlan(from, to, resolve, version, toKill)
_ = validateOrThrow(plan)
_ = log.info(s"Computed new deployment plan:\n$plan")
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ class ModelValidationTest
createServicePortApp("/c".toPath, 0)
))

val failedResult = Group.validGroupWithConfig(Some(2)).apply(group)
val failedResult = Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = Some(2)).apply(group)
failedResult.isFailure should be(true)
ValidationHelper.getAllRuleConstrains(failedResult)
.find(v => v.message.contains("This Marathon instance may only handle up to 2 Apps!")) should be ('defined)

val successfulResult = Group.validGroupWithConfig(Some(10)).apply(group)
val successfulResult = Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = Some(10)).apply(group)
successfulResult.isSuccess should be(true)
}

Expand All @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ class ModelValidationTest
val conflictingApp = createServicePortApp("/app2".toPath, 3200)

val group = Group(id = PathId.empty, apps = Set(existingApp, conflictingApp))
val result = validate(group)
val result = validate(group)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None))

ValidationHelper.getAllRuleConstrains(result).exists(v =>
v.message == "Requested service port 3200 conflicts with a service port in app /app2") should be(true)
Expand All @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ class ModelValidationTest
val conflictingApp = createServicePortApp("/app2".toPath, 3201)

val group = Group(id = PathId.empty, apps = Set(existingApp, conflictingApp))
val result = validate(group)
val result = validate(group)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None))

result.isSuccess should be(true)
}
Expand All @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ class ModelValidationTest
val conflictingApp = existingApp.copy(id = "/app2".toPath)

val group = Group(id = PathId.empty, apps = Set(existingApp, conflictingApp))
val result = validate(group)
val result = validate(group)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None))

ValidationHelper.getAllRuleConstrains(result).exists(v =>
v.message == "Requested service port 3200 conflicts with a service port in app /app2") should be(true)
Expand All @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ class ModelValidationTest
),
Group("/test/group2".toPath)))

validate(group) match {
validate(group)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None)) match {
case Success => fail()
case f: Failure =>
val errors = (Json.toJson(f) \ "details").as[Seq[JsObject]]
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ class GroupUpdateTest extends FunSuite with Matchers with GivenWhenThen {
When("The update is performed")
val result = update(group, timestamp)

validate(result).isSuccess should be(true)
validate(result)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None)).isSuccess should be(true)

Then("The update is applied correctly")
result.id should be(PathId.empty)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ class GroupUpdateTest extends FunSuite with Matchers with GivenWhenThen {
When("The update is performed")
val result: Group = update(actual, timestamp)

validate(result).isSuccess should be(true)
validate(result)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None)).isSuccess should be(true)

Then("The update is applied correctly")
result.id should be(PathId.empty)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ class GroupUpdateTest extends FunSuite with Matchers with GivenWhenThen {
val timestamp = Timestamp.now()
val result = update(current, timestamp)

validate(result).isSuccess should be(true)
validate(result)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None)).isSuccess should be(true)

Then("The update is reflected in the current group")
result.id.toString should be("/test")
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ class GroupUpdateTest extends FunSuite with Matchers with GivenWhenThen {
When("The update is performed")
val result = update(Group.empty, Timestamp.now())

validate(result).isSuccess should be(true)
validate(result)(Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None)).isSuccess should be(true)

Then("The update is applied correctly")
val group = result.group("test-group".toRootPath)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
package mesosphere.marathon.core.externalvolume.impl.providers

import com.wix.accord.{ RuleViolation, Success, Failure, Result }
import mesosphere.marathon.api.v2.Validation
import mesosphere.marathon.core.externalvolume.ExternalVolumes
import mesosphere.marathon.state._
import org.apache.mesos.{ Protos => MesosProtos }
import org.scalatest.{ FunSuite, GivenWhenThen, Matchers }
import play.api.libs.json.{ JsString, Json }

import scala.collection.immutable.Seq

class DVDIProviderRootGroupValidationTest extends FunSuite with Matchers with GivenWhenThen {

test("two volumes with different names should not result in an error") {
val f = new Fixture
Given("a root group with two apps and conflicting volumes")
val rootGroup = Group(
id = PathId.empty,
groups = Set(
Group(
id = PathId("/nested"),
apps = Set(
f.appWithDVDIVolume(appId = PathId("/nested/foo1"), volumeName = "vol1"),
f.appWithDVDIVolume(appId = PathId("/nested/foo2"), volumeName = "vol2")
)
)
)
)

f.checkResult(
rootGroup,
expectedViolations = Set.empty
)
}

test("two volumes with same name result in an error") {
val f = new Fixture
Given("a root group with two apps and conflicting volumes")
val app1 = f.appWithDVDIVolume(appId = PathId("/nested/app1"), volumeName = "vol")
val app2 = f.appWithDVDIVolume(appId = PathId("/nested/app2"), volumeName = "vol")
val rootGroup = Group(
id = PathId.empty,
groups = Set(
Group(
id = PathId("/nested"),
apps = Set(app1, app2)
)
)
)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: test("two volumes with same name, one in an app where instances=0, should succeed")

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed by #3751

f.checkResult(
rootGroup,
expectedViolations = Set(
RuleViolation(
value = app1.externalVolumes.head,
constraint = "Volume name 'vol' in /nested/app1 conflicts with volume(s) of same name in app(s): /nested/app2",
description = Some("/groups(0)/apps(0)/externalVolumes(0)")
),
RuleViolation(
value = app2.externalVolumes.head,
constraint = "Volume name 'vol' in /nested/app2 conflicts with volume(s) of same name in app(s): /nested/app1",
description = Some("/groups(0)/apps(1)/externalVolumes(0)")
)
)
)
}

class Fixture {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this a class instead of an object?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We use a similar pattern elsewhere. If your Fixture contains state, it is nice to use a new instance for every test run.

def appWithDVDIVolume(appId: PathId, volumeName: String, provider: String = DVDIProvider.name): AppDefinition = {
AppDefinition(
id = appId,
cmd = Some("sleep 123"),
upgradeStrategy = UpgradeStrategy.forResidentTasks,
container = Some(
Container(
`type` = MesosProtos.ContainerInfo.Type.MESOS,
volumes = Seq(
ExternalVolume(
containerPath = "ignoreme",
external = ExternalVolumeInfo(
name = volumeName,
provider = provider,
options = Map(
DVDIProvider.driverOption -> "rexray"
)
),
mode = MesosProtos.Volume.Mode.RW
)
)
)
)
)
}

def jsonResult(result: Result): String = {
Json.prettyPrint(
result match {
case Success => JsString("Success")
case f: Failure => Json.toJson(f)(Validation.failureWrites)
}
)
}

def checkResult(rootGroup: Group, expectedViolations: Set[RuleViolation]): Unit = {
val expectFailure = expectedViolations.nonEmpty

When("validating the root group")
val result = DVDIProviderValidations.rootGroup(rootGroup)

Then(s"we should ${if (expectFailure) "" else "NOT "}get an error")
withClue(jsonResult(result)) { result.isFailure should be(expectFailure) }

And("ExternalVolumes validation agrees")
val externalVolumesResult = ExternalVolumes.validRootGroup()(rootGroup)
withClue(jsonResult(externalVolumesResult)) { externalVolumesResult.isFailure should be(expectFailure) }

And("global validation agrees")
val globalResult: Result = Group.validRootGroup(maxApps = None)(rootGroup)
withClue(jsonResult(globalResult)) { globalResult.isFailure should be(expectFailure) }

val ruleViolations = globalResult match {
case Success => Set.empty[RuleViolation]
case f: Failure => f.violations.flatMap(Validation.allRuleViolationsWithFullDescription(_))
}

And("the rule violations are the expected ones")
withClue(jsonResult(globalResult)) {
ruleViolations should equal(expectedViolations)
}
}
}
}
Loading