Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Google DNS should use dns.google instead of dns.google.com #664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

EkkoG
Copy link
Contributor

@EkkoG EkkoG commented Sep 29, 2024

Background

Since Google recommend to use dns.google as a DoH server and we are trying add DoH support, and use both of them as a UDP or TCP DNS server is equal, so we can change the default config and docs early

https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/doh/migration?hl=zh-cn#base64url

#649 (comment)

Checklist

Full Changelogs

  • [Implement ...]

Issue Reference

Closes #[issue number]

Test Result

Since Google recommend to use dns.google as a DoH server and we are trying add DoH support, and use both of them as a UDP or TCP DNS server is equal, so we can change the default config and docs early

https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/doh/migration?hl=zh-cn#base64url
daeuniverse#649 (comment)
@mzz2017 mzz2017 changed the title chore: Google DNS should use dns.google instead of dns.google.com docs: Google DNS should use dns.google instead of dns.google.com Sep 29, 2024
@mzz2017 mzz2017 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation and removed chore labels Sep 29, 2024
@mzz2017 mzz2017 merged commit cb57bd5 into daeuniverse:main Sep 29, 2024
26 checks passed
@EkkoG EkkoG deleted the google_dns branch September 29, 2024 10:03
@dae-prow dae-prow bot mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants