Docker in Kata Container

The TLDR;

If you just want to see a docker daemon run in a kata container you can do so with just a few commands.

THIS_REPO="git@github.com:daniel-noland/docker-in-kata.git"
git clone "$THIS_REPO" && cd docker-in-kata
./build.sh # Only needed the first time you run or if you would like to start over
./run.sh

With that you should be at a root prompt in a triple nested docker container.

To run a different docker container in the kata container you can (after exiting the previous root shell)

docker exec -it kata-in-docker \
    docker exec -it kata \
        docker $YOUR_RUN_COMMANDS

For more details of how to use this code base see the how

The what

This repo is a proof of concept demo of running a full docker daemon in a kata container.

NOTE: While running docker in docker is generally fairly easy it is also somewhat problematic and frequently useless. See this repo both for details of why the "docker in docker" approach is often troubled and how you can do it anyway in the event that it is what you actually need.

The why

Docker and virtual machines both offer different (almost totally orthogonal) approaches to security and isolation. Kata containers provide the advantages (and some of the disadvantages) of both approaches.

There are several reasons why you might want to run a docker daemon in a kata container.

1. To offer a docker build environment to untrusted users or untrusted build contexts.
2. To ensure that you have precise control over the linux kernel used to run a container.
3. To offer each of several users isolated docker daemons running on the same physical machine.
4. To docker builds/run in a CI/CD system against a fixed linux kernel.
5. To run multiple docker containers within one kata container (e.g. for some networking simulations)
6. To test experimental docker features without changing the configuration of the docker daemon

I am sure others can dream up many more reasons.

The how

I did several non-obvious things to make a docker daemon run properly inside a kata container.

1. Due to the extremely minimal linux kernel used by default by the upstream kata project I needed to compile a new kata kernel. I choose linux kernel 5.4 since it is the current mainline kernel. It should be fairly trivial to change these scripts to use any kernel you like. Take a look in the Dockerfile for the kernel build section. The kernel .config file is simply COPYed in from the assets folder. Key things I needed to change included:

   • Copy the "official" 4.19 kata kernel .config into the 5.4 source folder and run make oldconfig to update the config file. I said no to essentially all of the prompts since the goal is to build a very minimal kernel.
   • Ran make menuconfig to get to a tui prompt where I
     • Added support for basic network operations (basically everything iptables does)
     • Added support for additional bridging functionality (for my own testing, likely not necessary)
     • Added support for btrfs filesystem (needed for externally mounted block device I use later)
     • Removed support for xfs filesystem (not necessary, I just didn't need it)
     • Added support for vhost and virtualization (as a first swing at making nested kata containers work) NOTE: The kernel I built is likely fine for many purposes but may or may not be what you are looking for. Feel free to use my kernel config as a starting point for setting up your own.

2. Once I had a kernel I was happy with I needed to build it. Because I wanted this project to be reasonably portable I took the somewhat unusual step of adding an additional level of containerization. There is an outer container which runs (via normal runc, not kata) a full systemd init system and docker daemon. In addition to being useful for my own purposes, this step allowed me to containerize everything about the kernel build step and the kata container configuration. Thus you can test kata without messing with your existing docker daemon at all. See the figure for a visual breakdown of what script does what and how data is mounted between the different containers.

   Note that this step is not strictly necessary, it simply makes things easier for me. In a real deployment I would likely configure the physical machine to run kata containers and eliminate a potentially confusing level of nesting. I very much doubt that this additional layer of nesting is offering any security advantage to speak of.

   I call this outer container the "proxy container" since it is functioning as a proxy for a physical host.

3. After I had a proxy container which could run a kata enable docker daemon I did one more slightly odd thing. I docker save the proxy container and export the entire image to a .tar file. This step allows me to simply docker load the same systemd + docker enabled image inside the proxy container. I launch this container within the proxy container with the important addition of the --runtime=kata flag. This step saves me the trouble of building a second container capable of running a docker daemon.

4. One additional crucial step deserves some discussion: the default filesystem used by kata containers is 9p. While 9p file systems are great at some things, they are ill suited to the task of running a nested docker container. To be more specific, there is a long standing problem which breaks commands which use the "open-unlink-fstat" idiom (one such command is apt-get update). See this bug report for more details.

   Further, even if the 9p mount worked, it would be a pain to get any container you built out of the double nested container.

   Both of these problems are easily solved via a btrfs formatted loopback device. Thus with some minor linux/docker foo in the setup.sh script I create, format, and mount a block file named var_lib_docker.img to the path /var/lib/docker in the inner kata container before I start the docker daemon. Mounting this block file causes docker to use its btrfs graph driver instead of the overlay graph driver. The btrfs driver has the advantage of being able transparently compress the files stored on it and to nest essentially infinitely. If you don't care about compression or copy-on-write then I would recommend formatting the block device with ext4.

   

Future plans

I think that the security of the setup is one area which can be greatly improved. I did my best to reduce the privileges granted to each of the outer two containers but I have not iterated on that very much. I think it may be possible to remove --security-opt seccomp=unconfined from one or both of the outer containers' run commands. If anybody has insights as to the actual minimum privileges that kata can run with I would really appreciate pointers about where I can cut down the privilege set. Maybe I will play around with some seccomp-bpf or apparmor / selinux inside the kata container. I could also try the new linux kernel 5.4 lockdown mode.

I have a few other things I would like to accomplish with this project:

1. Replace systemd with supervisord in one or both of the outer two containers. I don't think anything as heavy as systemd is really necessary here, it is just the thing I am most familiar with. Supervisord is likely better suited to this task.
2. Make a parallel version where I replace docker with podman. I have managed to make podman work with the btrfs graph driver and with kata elsewhere so in theory this approach should function. It may also offer improved security since podman would not require exposing a root privileged daemon. The podman approach would require that I not replace systemd with supervisord.
3. Look into running an entire mesos + marathon, kubernetes, or nomad cluster inside this setup at the first layer of containerization. This approach would provide a playground for the design and development of distributed systems / micro service architectures (you could quickly test scaling behavior, fault tolerance, failover).
4. Look into more convenient ways of sharing containers between the nesting scopes. Right now the only known ways to share container images between the kata scope and the host scope are:
   1. Use a shared container registry. Configuring access credentials makes this approach somewhat annoying. One way would be to volume mount ~/.docker from the host to the kata container (hopefully read-only). Another (likely more secure) approach would be to generate different registry credentials and volume mount those in.
   2. Mount the btrfs block device read-only in the host context (you will likely corrupt the block device if you mount it read-write in two places at once). This approach has limited use since the outer docker daemon will expect write access. Simply being able to read the contents of the nested /var/lib/docker is likely of little use.
   3. Use docker save / docker load and a shared volume or docker copy to exchange tar files. This approach is very cumbersome.
5. Look into more convenient ways of sharing container images between different nested docker daemons. This functionality would be very handy for testing distributed systems simulations where each kata container is functioning as a proxy for a distinct physical host. One approach which may prove useful (with some creativity) is to use LVM (or perhaps btrfs) snapshots. This could allow you to build in one kata container, take a snapshot, and then quickly replicate the build to various other nested containers without the time and storage cost of pushing and pulling the built image to a potentially large number of docker daemons.