-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DRY up the codebase #1
Comments
i am working on it and facing eslint problems since i am working on windows do i need to take care special care? |
@sourabh1031, are they the same problems you mentioned in your other issue danthareja/contribute-to-open-source-server#2? If so, did you try what I mentioned in the reply? |
Yes it got solved by your help thanks and now I must switch my work onto
Unix based system isn't?
…On Jan 14, 2018 9:32 AM, "Dan Thareja" ***@***.***> wrote:
@sourabh1031 <https://github.com/sourabh1031>, are they the same problems
you mentioned in your other issue danthareja/contribute-to-open-
source-server#2
<danthareja/contribute-to-open-source-server#2>?
If so, did you try what I mentioned in the reply?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYZ7Y0xcUkBTZhPexCCeW7PjDoWCAEsQks5tKXxmgaJpZM4QVZhc>
.
|
No need. As long as the styling issues are fixed, you can keep developing on Windows. |
Resolve Issue #1 - Dry up the database
* Implement _check function * Enable test to assert _check
Refactor calculator, enable test; fix #1
For anyone having a " Expected linebreaks to be 'LF' but found 'CRLF' " error, this is just a related to inconsistent line endings in the code. It is just a Windows problem because Windows uses CRLF (Carriage Return + Line Feed) while Unix based system like Linux and MacOS uses LF (Line Feed). For Windows users, you can use WSL or use article to know how to fix it https://medium.com/bootdotdev/how-to-get-consistent-line-breaks-in-vs-code-lf-vs-crlf-e1583bf0f0b6. This was scary as a beginner but I just googled it, and done. |
We're off to an amazing start disrupting the calculator industry. Our beautiful contributors burned all of last week's midnight oil to release our first version and the initial reception has been unprecedented!
After a code review from some experts, we've learned that there's some unnecessary repetition in the codebase. Removing this repetition will make our codebase easier to maintain as we continue to grow into the world's best calculator company.
The team is burnt out from last week's push and needs your help! Before blowing half of our capital investment on a vacation in the Swiss Alps, the team managed to write some tests for this refactor, and left behind a roadmap to the next big release:
describe.skip
todescribe.only
npm test
_check
to make the tests passdescribe.only
todescribe
so all the tests runnpm test
againThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: