Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Take all nodes into account in check_sigs instead of just just masternodes #3437

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2020

Conversation

codablock
Copy link

Checking only masternodes might result in wait_for_sigs returning too early
when waiting for signatures to get cleaned up, so that node0 still has
the signature locally and thus does not fully re-process new signatures.

This should fix remaining test failures in llmq-signing.py.

…nodes

Checking only masternodes might result in wait_for_sigs returning too early
when waiting for signatures to get cleaned up, so that node0 still has
the signature locally and thus does not fully re-process new signatures.
@codablock codablock added this to the 16 milestone Apr 18, 2020
@codablock
Copy link
Author

llmq-singing.py (with --spork21) was still failing due to another issue, which is fixed by the newly pushed commit.

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 merged commit 3d24290 into dashpay:develop Apr 19, 2020
@codablock codablock deleted the pr_fix_signing_tests branch April 20, 2020 06:53
gades pushed a commit to cosanta/cosanta-core that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2022
…nodes (dashpay#3437)

* Take all nodes into account in check_sigs instead of just just masternodes

Checking only masternodes might result in wait_for_sigs returning too early
when waiting for signatures to get cleaned up, so that node0 still has
the signature locally and thus does not fully re-process new signatures.

* Make sure node0 has received qsendrecsigs from the previously isolated node
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants