forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL #6408
Merged
PastaPastaPasta
merged 3 commits into
dashpay:develop
from
knst:fix-drop-pre-mnrr-CL-checks
Nov 20, 2024
Merged
refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL #6408
PastaPastaPasta
merged 3 commits into
dashpay:develop
from
knst:fix-drop-pre-mnrr-CL-checks
Nov 20, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I ran feature_llmq_chainlocks.py ~30 times without issue (with tsan / debug) locally |
PastaPastaPasta
previously approved these changes
Nov 19, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fork MN_RR is active awhile on testnet and mainnet and no more need legacy check
knst
force-pushed
the
fix-drop-pre-mnrr-CL-checks
branch
from
November 19, 2024 20:29
22f0179
to
3f2e064
Compare
UdjinM6
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 3f2e064
knst
pushed a commit
to knst/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
…f CL 3f2e064 refactor: set `const auto& cbTx` to avoid using optional throughout method (pasta) 0c0d91e fix: functional test feature_llmq_chainlocks.py should activate MN_RR instead v20 (Konstantin Akimov) af93e87 refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (Konstantin Akimov) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented The fork MN_RR is active awhile on testnet and mainnet and no more need legacy check ## What was done? Removes legacy version of checks for CL and related functional tests ## How Has This Been Tested? Run unit / functional test - DONE Reindex testnet - DONE Reindex mainnet - DONE ## Breaking Changes Removed pre-mn_rr version of checks for CL. It's no more relevant on mainnet and testnet. It affects behavior on new devnets and regtest for pre-mn_rr activation blocks. ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK 3f2e064 Tree-SHA512: 8b4b3a20a54602f4df9d98e17c79004214493b15c0bce9c08c68d667a5cba86b817947f008d646c48ef9f2f86676c02085c7d0ed36e83548ef5425b64faffb89
knst
pushed a commit
to knst/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
…f CL 3f2e064 refactor: set `const auto& cbTx` to avoid using optional throughout method (pasta) 0c0d91e fix: functional test feature_llmq_chainlocks.py should activate MN_RR instead v20 (Konstantin Akimov) af93e87 refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (Konstantin Akimov) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented The fork MN_RR is active awhile on testnet and mainnet and no more need legacy check ## What was done? Removes legacy version of checks for CL and related functional tests ## How Has This Been Tested? Run unit / functional test - DONE Reindex testnet - DONE Reindex mainnet - DONE ## Breaking Changes Removed pre-mn_rr version of checks for CL. It's no more relevant on mainnet and testnet. It affects behavior on new devnets and regtest for pre-mn_rr activation blocks. ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK 3f2e064 Tree-SHA512: 8b4b3a20a54602f4df9d98e17c79004214493b15c0bce9c08c68d667a5cba86b817947f008d646c48ef9f2f86676c02085c7d0ed36e83548ef5425b64faffb89
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
8b88ff7 Merge #6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta) 02ad523 Merge #6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta) 3bbcd3d Merge #6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta) 18f636f Merge #6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta) 9fed456 Merge #6407: fix: dataraces (pasta) 86105da Merge #6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta) a1f7e96 Merge #6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta) 90a3807 Merge #6402: ci: cache built (pasta) 66f6787 Merge #6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta) 7ca5663 Merge #6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta) Pull request description: ## What was done? See commits for each particular change ## How Has This Been Tested? To be deployed on testnet ## Breaking Changes N/A ## Checklist: - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK 8b88ff7 PastaPastaPasta: utACK 8b88ff7 Tree-SHA512: f7fac62996873503e7de875cc96d9cdf5675674345f1bb1df4a16bf19bddc17bc395a80cc761363a0121022d42c46fb313b0973b9cc71f568ef55c6b3d9e29d8
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2024
1c7bfcb chore: set release true (pasta) c90339e Merge dashpay#6459: docs: add release notes for v22.0.0 (pasta) a6f1fc5 Merge dashpay#6475: chore: bumped chain assumed sizes based on latest usage (pasta) d7cd9f1 Merge dashpay#6464: chore: update man pages for v22 (pasta) 212f91c Merge dashpay#6461: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta) 9a8b685 Merge dashpay#6460: chore: Translations 2024-12 (pasta) 2f71f4d Merge dashpay#6458: chore: bump MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION to latest proto (pasta) fa29ed5 Merge dashpay#6456: fix(qt): allow refreshing wallet data without crashing (pasta) 758cd64 Merge dashpay#6452: fix: store ready queues on the mixing masternode (pasta) 395447b Merge dashpay#6451: depends: update 'src/dashbls' to dashpay/bls-signatures@7e747e8a as 62fa665 (pasta) c7b0d80 Merge dashpay#6441: fix: hold wallet shared pointer in CJ Manager/Sessions to prevent concurrent unload (pasta) c074e09 Merge dashpay#6444: fix: add platform transfer to "most common" filter (pasta) cb04114 Merge dashpay#6442: fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (pasta) db5b53a Merge dashpay#6434: fix: early EHF and buried EHF are indistinguish (pasta) 8b88ff7 Merge dashpay#6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta) 02ad523 Merge dashpay#6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta) 3bbcd3d Merge dashpay#6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta) 18f636f Merge dashpay#6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta) 9fed456 Merge dashpay#6407: fix: dataraces (pasta) 86105da Merge dashpay#6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta) a1f7e96 Merge dashpay#6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta) 90a3807 Merge dashpay#6402: ci: cache built (pasta) 66f6787 Merge dashpay#6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta) 7ca5663 Merge dashpay#6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented ## What was done? Suppressed changes from 1c7bfcb and resolved merge conflicts. ``` Auto-merging .github/workflows/build.yml Auto-merging configure.ac Auto-merging src/chainparams.cpp Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.cpp CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.cpp Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.h CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.h Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.cpp CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.cpp Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.h CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.h Auto-merging src/evo/specialtxman.cpp Auto-merging src/init.cpp Auto-merging src/net_processing.cpp CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/net_processing.cpp Auto-merging src/net_processing.h Auto-merging src/qt/transactiontablemodel.cpp Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.cpp Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.h CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/wallet/wallet.h Auto-merging test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py ``` ## How Has This Been Tested? ## Breaking Changes ## Checklist: - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: PastaPastaPasta: utACK d108579; no diff to develop Tree-SHA512: 3f063011224880fee35edb04ce265dff33a52273c3d45ef1dbcebcecb22c25d8ad7c91b83514f36142716a6fbd0ddd3a8a3f2a9b59ce78ce975bbce69a2a13b5
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The fork MN_RR is active awhile on testnet and mainnet and no more need legacy check
What was done?
Removes legacy version of checks for CL and related functional tests
How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit / functional test - DONE
Reindex testnet - DONE
Reindex mainnet - DONE
Breaking Changes
Removed pre-mn_rr version of checks for CL.
It's no more relevant on mainnet and testnet.
It affects behavior on new devnets and regtest for pre-mn_rr activation blocks.
Checklist: