backport: bitcoin#24281, 24360, 24347, 24376, 24370, 24305 #6435
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vijaydasmp
changed the title
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
Dec_2024_01
branch
6 times, most recently
from
b3ba9de to
3861594
Compare
vijaydasmp
changed the title
|
Hello @PastaPastaPasta @UdjinM6 @knst requesting review |
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
Dec_2024_01
branch
from
3861594 to
b31c663
Compare
vijaydasmp
changed the title
UdjinM6
reviewed
Dec 7, 2024
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
Dec_2024_01
branch
from
b31c663 to
ef4fa46
Compare
added 5 commits
December 7, 2024 23:20
…m users and devs a4da16f Improve -netinfo help based on feedback from users and devs (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Clarify which networks are displayed by the peer counts table (*reachable* networks; follow-up to bitcoin#23324) in response to questions received over the past months, and a few other improvements. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK a4da16f w0xlt: ACK a4da16f kristapsk: utACK a4da16f Tree-SHA512: e6522c08421aa7f10d50723156d0a8fc5ec82cad2f0bd931bbec603077fcd4921c6505ef743d57386fba81c95dcfc77df75abf3378319886368e4ae33f9a6d73
…hain fa8dad0 rpc: Fix implicit-integer-sign-change in verifychain (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: It doesn't really make sense to treat `DEFAULT_CHECKLEVEL` as unsigned as long as `VerifyDB` accepts a signed integer. Making it signed also avoids a cast round trip from signed->unsigned->signed in the RPC. ACKs for top commit: luke-jr: utACK fa8dad0 theStack: Code-review ACK fa8dad0 Tree-SHA512: 75499dbe4ace2962792e5fbec7defb10c25fdbbfde951d5e542a91daa880cc50395da0287173e2c84a28e18267c74af7b44b9f38ce364bcb0216c402f65b7641
…comment) 62cc138 Rename wallet-tool to bitcoin-wallet in code comment (Kristaps Kaupe) 0db3ad3 Mention -signet in bitcoin-wallet help output (Kristaps Kaupe) Pull request description: * Mention `-signet` in sentence where there is already `-testnet/-signet` in help output. * Rename `wallet-tool` to `bitcoin-wallet` in single remaining place in code comments (was already done in bitcoin#17648 at other places). ACKs for top commit: RandyMcMillan: tACK 62cc138 Tree-SHA512: c5df7811b8200f61943908dcf3b2b788fe991bf00bef28f069ab8784924556ffd5d86fc0ba2ad0b3c3f9be2ba73a34bc67059d7c057bba646c1801ffa3cb2070
…getnodeaddresses and -addrinfo ce69084 cli: describe quality/recency filtering in -addrinfo (Jon Atack) 7c97561 rpc: describe quality/recency filtering in getnodeaddresses (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Addresses bitcoin#24278. ``` $ bitcoin-cli help getnodeaddresses getnodeaddresses ( count "network" ) Return known addresses, after filtering for quality and recency. These can potentially be used to find new peers in the network. The total number of addresses known to the node may be higher. ``` ``` $ bitcoin-cli -help | grep -A3 addrinfo -addrinfo Get the number of addresses known to the node, per network and total, after filtering for quality and recency. The total number of addresses known to the node may be higher. ``` ACKs for top commit: mzumsande: Thanks, Code Review ACK ce69084 prayank23: reACK bitcoin@ce69084 Tree-SHA512: 82d23b15e64a99411eb8e70d7267a1b4f23182fabe072e824277569d9677e392b466be63f00e3d157d7db94bbe032d53f12ad4ab30b55b7b8a629c37d80d1d8c
e50a9be Remove outdated comment on CFeeRate (Murch) Pull request description: This comment described how the constructor of CFeeRate was previously indirectly used to parse fee rate arguments from RPCs. The command line input was actually in sat/vB but due to the use of AmountFromValue() it got converted to BTC/vB which then got rectified in the constructor by creating a CFeeRate from that given value and COIN as the transaction size. Since this usage pattern was removed from the codebase some months ago, the comment is now obsolete. ACKs for top commit: michaelfolkson: ACK e50a9be jonatack: ACK e50a9be Tree-SHA512: f17bf0baeeca85a5c7883edadd407da845f6e3af1c949e93116bd67c02e601682a5f7f1ab2497172472e3acf1c4e3c234b01161a77e7d7f028e3551da34777f0
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
Dec_2024_01
branch
from
ef4fa46 to
e738513
Compare
UdjinM6
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backports