-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix checks for required fields for primary article #1258
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
44fbd9e
import button sentence casing
ahamelers bfde155
Closes https://github.com/CDL-Dryad/dryad-product-roadmap/issues/2585
ahamelers a99596b
use DOI placeholder to demonstrate actual DOI format
ahamelers dc20fe2
Fixing problems with primary article identifier and validation.
sfisher 924c3fb
rubocop
sfisher File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Audrey, this is the part that wasn't working and it was changed in this pull request. Before it had some conditions and returned at the first of the
article_id
method. If it got past returning early then it simply checked that a primary article existed.The logic in here lines 102-103 seem to be the following:
IF import_info == 'published' AND (the identifier has a publication DOI OR there is a primary article) THEN give an error.
I'm making another commit to fix this and another bug I found if someone puts in a bad identifier for the primary article first.
My new code is
It also just looks up the primary article from this resource. The identifier version looks through the whole history for a primary article, but we probably don't need to do that and if their primary article is gone then they probably should change the options from those 3 choices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sfisher This part that you have quoted is just a variable to show a journal name in the error message if one is present, because the error message previously had a journal name in it and I wanted to maintain that, but now I'm showing the same error even if the journal name is blank. What's not working about it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I think I can see in the old code, that previously the primary_article DOI check was only triggered if the publication_doi field was blank. I guess when I was reconfiguring these checks I thought that was a bug, because this new change is a check that ensures the publication_doi field will never be left blank if the published article import option is selected, which means the primary_article DOI check will never be triggered—and there's an rspec test for it and everything! If it never being triggered is preferred, should I not just remove that primary_article check entirely?