Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

draft for support python in base mat macros #6127

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ChenyuLInx
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #

Description

Checklist

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Oct 25, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide.

{% elif full_refresh_mode %}
{% set build_sql = get_create_table_as_sql(False, intermediate_relation, sql) %}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jtcohen6 any concern moving from get_create_table_as_sql to create_table_as?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh — technically, create_table_as is the old/originally name, get_create_table_as_sql was meant to be more consistent with the fact that macros which don't actually perform a side effect (run_query), but simply return code (SQL) as a string, were named get_x_sql. It's a convention we have been very imperfect about following.

We made this change in the leadup to v1.0, based on feedback from @dataders (before he worked with us!): #4154 (review)

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2023

This PR has been marked as Stale because it has been open with no activity as of late. If you would like the PR to remain open, please comment on the PR or else it will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Issues that have gone stale label May 3, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Although we are closing this PR as stale, it can still be reopened to continue development. Just add a comment to notify the maintainers.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla:yes stale Issues that have gone stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants