Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #8031: Call materialization macro from adapter dispatch #8355
Fix #8031: Call materialization macro from adapter dispatch #8355
Changes from 12 commits
3d2dd84
8e801b5
70749e7
9b67180
c652e8c
8e7726d
8a68245
6a3e8ae
33a1483
baca60f
756e257
126c54f
feaec5c
fbd2fc9
41c6512
aaafbe7
97725ef
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we made a fix recently for scenarios where macros that started with "materialization_" were incorrectly being picked up as materializations. For example, this was being flagged as a materialization instead of a macro:
Have you verified this doesn't reintroduce that issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have tests for that case now, so this PR shouldn't reintroduce the issue (or if it does, it'll be obvious before merging).
#8181