Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test: only run coveralls on travis #664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2018
Merged

test: only run coveralls on travis #664

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2018

Conversation

MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

s/posttest:node/coverage

Explicitly call coverage only from CI. This will stop the test suite
from failing on a system not configured to authenticate with
circle-ci

@MylesBorins
test: only run coveralls on travis
f83981b 
s/posttest:node/coverage

Explicitly call coverage only from CI. This will stop the test suite
from failing on a system not configured to authenticate with
circle-ci
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 87.692% when pulling f83981b on MylesBorins:only-run-coverage-in-ci into 825d35a on visionmedia:master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 87.692% when pulling f83981b on MylesBorins:only-run-coverage-in-ci into 825d35a on visionmedia:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 87.692% when pulling f83981b on MylesBorins:only-run-coverage-in-ci into 825d35a on visionmedia:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 87.692% when pulling f83981b on MylesBorins:only-run-coverage-in-ci into 825d35a on visionmedia:master.

@Qix-
Copy link
Member

Qix- commented Dec 22, 2018

Thanks, this was indeed getting annoying :)

@Qix- Qix- merged commit 982c12c into debug-js:master Dec 22, 2018
This was referenced Aug 13, 2019
Merged
Closed
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2019
Merged
This was referenced Oct 17, 2019
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
This was referenced Oct 26, 2019
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
This was referenced Nov 11, 2019
Open
Merged
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2019
Open
This was referenced Dec 4, 2019
Merged
Merged
Merged
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2020
Open
This was referenced Mar 8, 2020
Open
Closed
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2020
Closed
This was referenced Mar 12, 2021
Merged
Open
Merged
Merged
@dmrazzy dmrazzy mentioned this pull request May 28, 2024
Open
@YoutacRandS-VA YoutacRandS-VA mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Open
@EitanGayor EitanGayor mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2024
Open
@baardl baardl mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2024
Closed
@christophergoodwi christophergoodwi mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2024
Closed
@EitanGayor EitanGayor mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2024
Open
@Vin757 Vin757 mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2024
Merged
@javascript-benchmark javascript-benchmark mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2024
Open
@WontonSam WontonSam mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2024
Open
@gmsoft-tuxicoman gmsoft-tuxicoman mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2024
Open
@mhill-os mhill-os mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Open
@Howyi888 Howyi888 mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2024
Open
@WontonSam WontonSam mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2024
Open
@christophergoodwi christophergoodwi mentioned this pull request Aug 18, 2024
Closed
This was referenced Aug 18, 2024
Open
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@MylesBorins @coveralls @Qix-