Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use same fee policies across all networks. #160

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2016
Merged

Conversation

jrick
Copy link
Member

@jrick jrick commented May 6, 2016

Fixes #151.

@jrick
Copy link
Member Author

jrick commented May 6, 2016

Obviously, this will need an change in wallet software as well, otherwise non-mainnet transactions will be rejected for paying too low in fees.

Unfortunately, since the testnet and simnet fees are being increased rather than decreased, we can't roll out this change to many dcrd nodes first and then update the wallet software, to help with transaction propagation.

@chappjc
Copy link
Member

chappjc commented May 6, 2016

I have about 4 testnet nodes. How can I help with this? My pools are stagnant during fees upgrading, so I don't really care about them right now.

@jrick
Copy link
Member Author

jrick commented May 6, 2016

you can help by not running it yet :)

the problem is that there are no wallets that are creating fees this high, so your node will essentially only relay blocks instead of freestanding transactions.

once the accompanying wallet change has been created, both can be tested together, and several nodes with this patch should relay transactions without any issues.

@chappjc
Copy link
Member

chappjc commented May 6, 2016

That's what it sounded like. :) I'll hold off.

@jrick
Copy link
Member Author

jrick commented May 9, 2016

decred/dcrwallet#235 implements the corresponding change for the wallet.

@alexlyp alexlyp merged commit 335093e into decred:master May 18, 2016
@jcvernaleo jcvernaleo added this to the v0.1.4 milestone May 25, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants