Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fsGroupPolicy support for Unity XT #75

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 26, 2022
Merged

fsGroupPolicy support for Unity XT #75

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 26, 2022

Conversation

rajendraindukuri
Copy link
Collaborator

@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri commented Jul 20, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Description

  • Added FSGroupPolicy support for Unity XT
  • Updated samples for Unity XT driver 2.4.0

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#361

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Testing screenshots:

image

image

image

image

@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri force-pushed the feature-361-add-support-for-fsgroup branch from 99202e3 to e50a2b0 Compare July 22, 2022 07:25
panigs7
panigs7 previously approved these changes Jul 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
panigs7
panigs7 previously approved these changes Jul 26, 2022
View reviewed changes
@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri merged commit 90991a8 into main Jul 26, 2022
@rensyct rensyct deleted the feature-361-add-support-for-fsgroup branch January 3, 2023 06:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@panigs7 panigs7 panigs7 approved these changes

@rensyct rensyct rensyct approved these changes

@abhi16394 abhi16394 Awaiting requested review from abhi16394 abhi16394 is a code owner

@bpjain2004 bpjain2004 Awaiting requested review from bpjain2004 bpjain2004 is a code owner

@boyamurthy boyamurthy Awaiting requested review from boyamurthy

@Deepak-Ghivari Deepak-Ghivari Awaiting requested review from Deepak-Ghivari Deepak-Ghivari is a code owner

@francis-nijay francis-nijay Awaiting requested review from francis-nijay francis-nijay is a code owner

@karthikk92 karthikk92 Awaiting requested review from karthikk92 karthikk92 is a code owner

@bandak2 bandak2 Awaiting requested review from bandak2 bandak2 is a code owner

@mjsdell mjsdell Awaiting requested review from mjsdell mjsdell is a code owner

@nitesh3108 nitesh3108 Awaiting requested review from nitesh3108 nitesh3108 is a code owner

@prablr79 prablr79 Awaiting requested review from prablr79 prablr79 is a code owner

@randeepdell randeepdell Awaiting requested review from randeepdell

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@rajendraindukuri @rensyct @panigs7