Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementing CHECK constraints #1881

Closed
hntd187 opened this issue Nov 18, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Implementing CHECK constraints #1881

hntd187 opened this issue Nov 18, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@hntd187
Copy link
Collaborator

hntd187 commented Nov 18, 2023

Description

As part of 3,7 support, implement check constraints on tables. #1568 @MrPowers could you please assign me this so others know

Use Case

Related Issue(s)
#1568

@hntd187 hntd187 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 18, 2023
@ion-elgreco
Copy link
Collaborator

ion-elgreco commented Nov 18, 2023

@hntd187 you can write 'take', to assign yourself

@hntd187
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hntd187 commented Nov 18, 2023

take

@MrPowers
Copy link
Contributor

@r3stl355 - I love "take". Thank you!!

roeap pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2023
# Description
This PR adds CHECK constraints on delta tables. I still have some
outstanding work to do on this, but this is my working draft PR for this
feature.

```rust
let constraint = table.add_constraint().with_constraint("id", "id < 100");
constraint.await?;
```

# Related Issue(s)
#1881 

# Documentation

<!---
Share links to useful documentation
--->

---------

Co-authored-by: Stephen Carman <stephen.carman@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: scarman-db <106979814+scarman-db@users.noreply.github.com>
@hntd187 hntd187 closed this as completed Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants