Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(runtime/http): websocket support #10359
feat(runtime/http): websocket support #10359
Changes from 6 commits
c17a720
e63b02b
6de42f0
a313886
a94cbca
de350f5
dc9056d
48e0e23
2499a5a
b494a44
35d375a
85639fb
e855c63
b8aa871
afe1d99
e149890
d4a51bf
613636d
9b32625
fa193cf
dddfc29
7de7397
0a70386
4fe1e79
aad5ee6
087aed1
15ae4c0
9e2b416
2dc7e8c
66ba74d
d940e7e
c86e7bb
79c324e
54941c1
588c563
8a1f533
8f99e87
46d6591
17d5038
65536d1
05b8166
fc8b27f
8a9e486
ac56367
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we use
upgrade
instead ofupgradeWebsocket
? a simple API can get better dev experience.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, upgrading isn't something exclusive to websockets. that would end up being misleading and confusing.
9 more characters in a function name used in a single place wont affect dev experience.
Of course that would make sense if we would support upgrading other kind of conns out of the box
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other hypothetical upgrades would have different return types, so they should just have individual names anyway.