Implement Best Practices Changes

[Jdubrick]

What does this PR do?

This PR adds the OpenSSF Best Practices Badge to the README file as well as exempts this repository from the ArtifactHub and License Scanning checks for the CLOMonitor. These checks are being exempted from almost all of our repositories.

Which issue(s) does this PR fix

fixes devfile/api#1384 (all but scorecard that is going to be added later)

PR acceptance criteria

Testing and documentation do not need to be complete in order for this PR to be approved. We just need to ensure tracking issues are opened.

• Unit/Functional tests

• Documentation

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8f277a2) 73.16% compared to head (f80e432) 73.16%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #41   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.16%   73.16%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        1565     1565           
=======================================
  Hits         1145     1145           
  Misses        351      351           
  Partials       69       69           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[thepetk]

/lgtm
From what I found here & here it looks good to me. Out of curiosity I'd like to ask what are the criteria of choosing those specific exemptions (e.g license_scanning instead of others that are listed in the shared resources).

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Jdubrick, thepetk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Jdubrick,thepetk]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Jdubrick]

/lgtm From what I found here & here it looks good to me. Out of curiosity I'd like to ask what are the criteria of choosing those specific exemptions (e.g license_scanning instead of others that are listed in the shared resources).

Reasoning behind exempting the Artifact Hub and License Scanning checks were mainly due to this repository not having anything that should be hosted onto Artifact Hub, such as Helm Charts. As for License Scanning we don't have any of the services currently to support that and as they are paid we don't have any plan to implement them at this time.

What shared resources are you referring to?

[thepetk]

What shared resources are you referring to?

@Jdubrick I meant the two links in the comment :D

For the included checks it makes sense to me. But what was the criteria of selecting these two checks instead of others listed here: https://clomonitor.io/docs/topics/checks/

[Jdubrick]

What shared resources are you referring to?

@Jdubrick I meant the two links in the comment :D

For the included checks it makes sense to me. But what was the criteria of selecting these two checks instead of others listed here: https://clomonitor.io/docs/topics/checks/

@thepetk Oh I understand now! The reason for choosing those two checks is because most of the others don't apply to this repository, we can view all the ones for Alizer here: https://clomonitor.io/projects/cncf/devfile#alizer. For the Cleaner tasks it includes the Documentation, License, and Best Practices Section.