Reduce unnecessary allocations and sorting to improve performance #41
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As shown in the pprof graph to be attached in the pull request, the previous implementation has the following time spent: gcBgMarkWorker 24.37% mallocgc 15.21% sort.Sort 9.06% gcWriteBarrier 7.2% which adds up to almost half the running time. The pprof graph after this change (to be also attached) shows that these memory allocations and sorting operations are indeed reduced.
dhconnelly
reviewed
Aug 13, 2022
dhconnelly
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As shown in the pprof graph to be attached in the pull request,
the previous implementation has the following time spent:
gcBgMarkWorker 24.37%
mallocgc 15.21%
sort.Sort 9.06%
gcWriteBarrier 7.2%
which adds up to almost half the running time.
The pprof graph after this change (to be also attached) shows that these memory allocations
and sorting operations are indeed reduced.