Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use builder pattern for CheckConfig #633

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

dabd
Copy link
Contributor

@dabd dabd commented Feb 6, 2023

What

Why

@dabd
Copy link
Contributor Author

dabd commented Feb 7, 2023

If it is acceptable to have a compile-time only dependency could use https://github.com/alexarchambault/data-class.

Actually, no need to add a dependency, I could inline the macro expansion for @data class CheckConfig...

@dabd dabd marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2023 09:42
@Baccata Baccata added the !! binary breaking !! Breaks binary compatibility label Feb 20, 2023
@dabd dabd closed this Feb 23, 2023
@dabd dabd reopened this Feb 23, 2023
@keuhdall
Copy link

Hi ! What's the status of this PR ? I'm experiencing the same issues when dealing with seeds atm ☹️

@dabd
Copy link
Contributor Author

dabd commented Sep 6, 2023

Hi ! What's the status of this PR ? I'm experiencing the same issues when dealing with seeds atm ☹️

Because this PR is binary breaking, I am not sure if/when it will be merged 🤷

@dabd
Copy link
Contributor Author

dabd commented May 3, 2024

Resolved by typelevel/weaver-test#39.

@dabd dabd closed this May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
!! binary breaking !! Breaks binary compatibility
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CheckConfig should accept org.scalacheck.rng.Seed instead of Long
3 participants