Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Issue 16593 - Building "tools" produces deprecation warnings #201

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2016

Conversation

CyberShadow
Copy link
Member

@CyberShadow CyberShadow commented Oct 4, 2016

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix Bugzilla Description
16593 Building "tools" produces deprecation warnings

Copy link
Member

@wilzbach wilzbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good spot - maybe we should add the building of all tools here to Travis too?

@@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ void usage()

int main(string[] args)
{
if (args.length == 1) return usage(), 1;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Holy cow a comma operator in the wild, and it's in our repo. 😆

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd never doubt you would push the language to your advantage. :)

@AndrejMitrovic
Copy link
Contributor

What's up with Travis lately? Is master broken or is it something else?

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

What's up with Travis lately? Is master broken or is it something else?

Yep with 2.072 we had some issues, luckily they have been fixed with #202.

@CyberShadow I just rebased your PR to the upstream/master, s.t. Travis passes & we can move forward (I like the new GitHub feature).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants