Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added partial support for abritrary precision calculations #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tauu
Copy link
Collaborator

@tauu tauu commented Aug 7, 2014

Added the variable $RHWorkingPrecision to set a "WorkingPrecision" for the Package.
So far this setting is only used by IFuns and functions required to solve RHPs,
which solely need Cauchy transforms over contours consisting of lines or rays.

The overhead to support this functionality is about 2% - 3% CPU Time,
when using MachinePrecision calculation.

I'm not really sure if this should be included in the master branch, because it is only an incomplete implementation and not extensively tested. But maybe it's useful for you.

All calculation are using the precision given by $RHWorkingPrecision.
Currently this only works for IFuns and solving RHPs which solely need
Cauchy tansforms over contours consisting of lines or rays.

The overhead to support this functionality is about 2% - 3% CPU Time,
when using MachinePrecision calcultion.
@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Owner

If there's overhead, maybe this should be in a separate branch? How do I pull this into the branch? Or I guess I can leave it as tauu:workingprecision

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants