-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consolidate security options to use =
as separator.
#21232
Consolidate security options to use =
as separator.
#21232
Conversation
66251b9
to
e2f9e74
Compare
LGTM |
Design LGTM |
e2f9e74
to
f412c22
Compare
👍 thanks! |
Will need to search the docs to update the examples |
f412c22
to
377f82b
Compare
@thaJeztah I think I got all of them, but please double check. |
@calavera docs look good, possibly needed; bash completion: Do we need a deprecation warning? (do we plan to deprecate the old notation?) |
LGTM 🐼 |
agreed
we don't do any parsing client side, and we don't show other warnings like this in the client afaik, but I can add it if people want it. |
7a96715
to
0d55e0d
Compare
The SELinux label ones have multiple ":" in them.
I guess becomes
|
I guess becomes
Yes |
We do some parsing client side, as the seccomp config file is parsed client side. |
@justincormack yes, we use this function: https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/21232/files#diff-555969c76e0ae264bc1e3c8e880cb50cR509 |
All other options we have use `=` as separator, labels, log configurations, graph configurations and so on. We should be consistent and use `=` for the security options too. Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
0d55e0d
to
cb9aeb0
Compare
LGTM |
Consolidate security options to use `=` as separator.
@@ -1788,17 +1788,17 @@ _docker_run() { | |||
;; | |||
--security-opt) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry David, this change does not work: =
cannot be substituted for :
here because it is in COMP_WORDBREAKS
.
I will create a fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
note: to be accurate: :
us also in $COMP_WORDBREAKS
but there is speacial treatment for it in
_get_comp_words_by_ref -n : cur prev words cword
Fix created: #21584
All other options we have use
=
as separator, labels,log configurations, graph configurations and so on.
We should be consistent and use
=
for the securityoptions too.
I change the daemon parsing to accept
=
. It stillsupports
:
but it logs a warning when this separatoris used.
Let's decide if we want to do this and I'll complete it
with tests and documentation changes.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera david.calavera@gmail.com