-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support documents starting with a literal block marker #134
Conversation
426b67a
to
6d06209
Compare
Yes, I am. Unless I'm missing something, this "bug"/missing feature does exists in all branches of the repo |
OK just checking, because all this sudden interest for the package looked suspicious :) |
@greg0ire fyi, we're going to use this package in a new section on symfony.com. So we're now polishing lots of the great work done by Ryan over the past 2 years to try out this package on the Symfony docs. You can expect some activity from us the next weeks (and hopefully overall more activity in the years to come). |
Ok so since this is a bugfix, 0.2.x is definitely the correct branch 👍 |
Indeed! I didn't spot that subtle change. I found that commit with |
There is a conflict you will need to fix. |
6d06209
to
45f221c
Compare
Thanks for the notification! Rebased :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Wouter!
Thanks @wouterj ! |
This fixes https://github.com/weaverryan/docs-builder/issues/36:
Related reStructuredText specs section: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#literal-blocks I'm a bit unsure about the tests that I modified. Looking at this spec and Sphinx behavior, the previously expected HTML is not correct. They appear to be introduced in cb831fb, so that also doesn't reveal any original reasoning behind these tests.
This was already implemented 😄
Meanwhile, I also took some freedom to slightly modify how the functional tests are run. This allows running a specific functional test using:This is very useful for me, as I need to var_dump quite a lot to make sense of this new code base.I'm a bit unsure what version to use for this repository: there is 0.1.x, 0.2.x, 1.0.x and master(and I couldn't find any contributing guidelines, probably because this is a quite internal project). So I just took the default one. Please let me know if this is wrong and I need to rebase.