Add ApplicationConfigurer.Handlers().
#170
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
See https://github.com/dogmatiq/example/compare/handlers-method for updated example. |
koden-km
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What change does this introduce?
This PR adds a
Handlers()method toAggregateConfigurerand deprecates the existingRegisterAggregate(),RegisterProcess(),RegisterIntegration()andRegisterProjection()methods.Why make this change?
This change allows for new handler types and options to be added in the future without introducing a compile-time BC break to engine implementations. This is part of a broader attempt to reduce the chance of engine-facing BC breakages so that the
dogmamodule can be versioned according to semver as it applies to application developers.For precedent, see the addition of the
Routes()method for handlers in v0.12.0.Is there anything you are unsure about?
No
What issues does this relate to?
#169