Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add static references for Dijit constructor #11

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2017

Conversation

kitsonk
Copy link
Member

@kitsonk kitsonk commented Sep 20, 2017

Type: bug

The following has been addressed in the PR:

  • There is a related issue
  • All code matches the style guide
  • Unit or Functional tests are included in the PR

Description:

By holding static references on the class object, it appears to stop IE11 from doing mis-appropriate GC on arguments passed the mixin function. Gotta love browser inconsistency.

Resolves #10

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #11 into master will increase coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #11      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.64%   94.82%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines          56       58       +2     
  Branches       12       12              
==========================================
+ Hits           53       55       +2     
  Partials        3        3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/dijit/DijitWrapper.ts 95.83% <100%> (+0.18%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 765dc2c...789c80b. Read the comment docs.

@dylans dylans added this to the 2017.09 milestone Sep 20, 2017
@kitsonk kitsonk merged commit 5d7f0b8 into dojo:master Sep 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants