Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: revert #300

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

fix: revert #300

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

ponderingdemocritus
Copy link
Contributor

@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus commented Oct 11, 2024

  • reverts

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and logging for value conversion failures.
    • Streamlined conversion logic for various data types, enhancing reliability.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified control flow and reduced redundancy in the conversion function.
    • Enhanced clarity of the handling for StringArray, BigInt, and struct types.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The convertValues function in packages/state/src/utils/index.ts has been significantly modified. The updates include the removal of initial validation checks for schema and values, streamlining the handling of StringArray, adjusting error handling for BigInt, and simplifying the processing of struct types and array handling. These changes aim to enhance the clarity and conciseness of the function while preserving its core functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/state/src/utils/index.ts - Removed validation checks for schema and values.
- Streamlined handling of StringArray and consolidated nested conditions.
- Adjusted error handling for BigInt conversion.
- Simplified handling of struct types and array processing.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Functions hop and skip away.
Streamlined paths and clearer ways,
Convert with joy through sunny days!
With each change, we leap and cheer,
For simpler code, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus merged commit b3267dc into main Oct 11, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus deleted the fix/recs-sync branch October 11, 2024 01:59
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66627bc and fcd7fea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/state/src/utils/index.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/state/src/utils/index.ts (1)

33-42: Handle potential errors when converting array items to BigInt

When mapping over value.value, each item's a.value is being converted to BigInt. If the conversion fails, the code logs a warning and returns the original a.value. Ensure that this fallback is acceptable for downstream processing, as it may result in mixed types within the array.

Consider verifying that all items in value.value can be converted to BigInt or adjust the error handling accordingly.

Run the following script to identify non-convertible values:

Comment on lines +26 to +28
value.type === "array" &&
value.value[0].type === "enum"
) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add a check for non-empty array before accessing value.value[0]

In the condition on lines 26-28, you're accessing value.value[0].type without ensuring that value.value is not an empty array. This could lead to an error if value.value is an empty array. Consider adding a check to ensure value.value.length > 0 before accessing the first element.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

} else if (
    value.type === "array" &&
+   value.value.length > 0 &&
    value.value[0].type === "enum"
) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
value.type === "array" &&
value.value[0].type === "enum"
) {
value.type === "array" &&
value.value.length > 0 &&
value.value[0].type === "enum"
) {

Comment on lines +55 to +58
`Failed to convert ${value.value} to BigInt. Using string value instead.`
);
try {
acc[key] = BigInt(`0x${value.value}`);
} catch (hexError) {
console.warn(
`Failed to convert ${value.value} to BigInt even with hexadecimal. Assigning undefined.`
);
acc[key] = undefined;
}

acc[key] = BigInt(`0x${value.value}`);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Align warning message with error handling logic

The warning message indicates that the string value will be used instead of a BigInt, but the code attempts to parse the value as a hexadecimal string and convert it to BigInt. This inconsistency might cause confusion.

Please update the warning message to reflect the actual behavior:

console.warn(
-    `Failed to convert ${value.value} to BigInt. Using string value instead.`
+    `Failed to convert ${value.value} to BigInt. Attempting to parse as hexadecimal.`
);

Alternatively, if the intention is to use the string value directly when parsing fails, adjust the code accordingly:

try {
    acc[key] = BigInt(value.value);
} catch (error) {
    console.warn(
        `Failed to convert ${value.value} to BigInt. Using string value instead.`
    );
    acc[key] = value.value;
}

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Comment on lines +82 to +84
acc[key] = value.value.map((item: any) =>
convertValues(schemaType[0], item)
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure schemaType array is not empty before accessing schemaType[0]

In the array handling logic, you're accessing schemaType[0] without checking if schemaType has any elements. If schemaType is an empty array, this will result in undefined, potentially causing errors in convertValues. Consider adding a check to ensure schemaType.length > 0 before accessing schemaType[0].

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

} else if (
    Array.isArray(schemaType) &&
+   schemaType.length > 0 &&
    value.type === "array"
) {
    acc[key] = value.value.map((item: any) =>
        convertValues(schemaType[0], item)
    );
}

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant