Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix in-memory implementation of RenameTable to read from session #2398

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

jycor
Copy link
Contributor

@jycor jycor commented Mar 15, 2024

The in-memory implementation of RenameTable uses data from the BaseDatabase, instead of reading it from the session.
This is problematic when there are multiple alter statements.

Additonally, includes some small refactor so all functions are pointer receiver instead of a mix.

fixes #2396

Copy link
Member

@zachmu zachmu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good find, but the wrong fix. Needs more digging.

@@ -6182,6 +6182,34 @@ where
},
},
},
{
Name: "alter statements apply correctly",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kind of a vague name, what specifically are you testing here? How is this not covered in TestAlterTable e.g.?

memory/table.go Outdated
@@ -1415,6 +1415,7 @@ func (t *Table) ModifyColumn(ctx *sql.Context, columnName string, column *sql.Co
}
}

t.db.tables[t.name] = t
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is supposed to happen when the session is committed. Why isn't it? You have to fix that bug, not mess up the global state here.

Copy link
Member

@zachmu zachmu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jycor jycor changed the title fix in-memory implementation of ModifyColumn to update BaseDatabase fix in-memory implementation of RenameTable to read from session Mar 18, 2024
@jycor jycor merged commit be0d26d into main Mar 18, 2024
7 checks passed
@jycor jycor deleted the james/alter branch March 18, 2024 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Running multiple migrations in a transaction
2 participants