Avoid wrapping args with partial when avoiding optionals

[maclockard]

Description

Makes it so arguments don't get wrapped with a Partial when configured to avoid optionals for input values. Without this change, avoidOptionals = true ends up being inconsistent since it will still use optional input values in the case there is only nullable arguments.

Related #9438

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Added a test that avoid optionals does not wrap the arguments with a partial when configured.

• Avoid optional ignored when all arguments optional #9438 - avoidOptionals should not wrap arguments with partial

Test Environment:

• OS: macOS
• @graphql-codegen/typescript-resolvers: 4.0.1
• NodeJS: 16.x

Checklist:

• I have followed the CONTRIBUTING doc and the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

I think this should be fairly uncontroversial since it is preserving the intention of the avoid optionals config.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: efb17e2

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 9 packages

Name	Type
@graphql-codegen/visitor-plugin-common	Patch
@graphql-codegen/typescript-resolvers	Patch
@graphql-codegen/typescript-document-nodes	Patch
@graphql-codegen/gql-tag-operations	Patch
@graphql-codegen/typescript-operations	Patch
@graphql-codegen/typed-document-node	Patch
@graphql-codegen/typescript	Patch
@graphql-codegen/graphql-modules-preset	Patch
@graphql-codegen/client-preset	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[maclockard]

Let me know whether a minor or patch bump is preferred for the relevant packages

[saihaj]

Let me know whether a minor or patch bump is preferred for the relevant packages

Hey @maclockard thanks for creating this fix. Can you please run yarn changeset and add a patch changeset explaining your change so we can get this merged. Learn more about changeset

[maclockard]

@saihaj Added a changeset!

[maclockard]

@saihaj anything else needed to merge this?

[saihaj]

thank you @maclockard