Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix disable native toolset install logic #4265

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 1, 2019

Conversation

chcosta
Copy link
Member

@chcosta chcosta commented Nov 1, 2019

No description provided.

@chcosta
Copy link
Member Author

chcosta commented Nov 1, 2019

@sunandabalu
Copy link
Member

Probably a good idea a kick off a Winforms build, since that was the original issue.

@sunandabalu
Copy link
Member

Change itself looks fine to me.

@chcosta
Copy link
Member Author

chcosta commented Nov 1, 2019

Technically, they don't exercise this particular code path, but I agree that more validation is good and it would be bad to unintentionally regress them yet again. Thanks for the note, I created dotnet/winforms#2260 to validate winforms.

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

You are right, I accidently reverted the condition. Are you sure that you would do a Test-Path on a boolean in powershell? Doesn't a -ne suffice?

@chcosta
Copy link
Member Author

chcosta commented Nov 1, 2019

The code is following a quirky pattern. Essentially, "DisableNativeToolsetInstalls" is being used as a switch rather than a boolean. If it's present, then the flag is enabled. Meaning, DisableNativeToolsetInstalls=$true and DisableNativeToolsetInstalls=$false are equivalent. Another option would be to do something like

If((test-path variable:DisableNativeToolsetInstalls) - and $DisableNativeToolsetInstalls)

That would be the more expected behavior. I won't be able to do any validation or make any changes on this until tomorrow.

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

ViktorHofer commented Nov 1, 2019

@chcosta @sunandabalu I just did a thorough root analysis of the bugs introduced in 7a82f9a:

  1. The config-toolset.sh import is broken, the file isn't imported anymore at all. This impacts not just native toolset bootstrapping but also cli and nuget cache settings. The null comparison was wrong.
  2. The condition which checks on the variable DisableNativeToolsetInstalls was inverted. It took me a while to understand the whole syntax of the line: if [[ -z "${DisableNativeToolsetInstalls:-}" ]]; then. The variable expansion :- sets the variable to $null if the variable is not defined. The -z option checks if the string is null, that is, has zero length. With that logic the toolset bootstrapping would be skipped if the variable IS NOT defined which we don't want. The fix is to use the -n option instead which checks if the string is not null.
  3. The condition to check the if ($env:DisableNativeToolsetInstalls) variable in the tools.ps1 script was wrong which resulted in the exit branch never to be reached. The correct usage, as Chris mentioned is to check via Test-Path and with -eq operations. My first PR unfortunately failed doing this correctly, thanks Chris for letting me know.

I submitted the fixes into this PR and validated it offline on both corefx and the runtime repository.

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer merged commit d2d8d9f into dotnet:master Nov 1, 2019
@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

Merging to unblock repos which might have been broken by my previous attempt.

@riarenas
Copy link
Member

riarenas commented Nov 1, 2019

Is there a scenario we should add to the arcade-validation repo that would have caught this, and would catch similar problems going forward?

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

Yes that would be good if we want to rely on the native toolset bootstrapping goind forward.

@chcosta
Copy link
Member Author

chcosta commented Nov 1, 2019

I think adding unit tests to arcade for our powershell scripts would be my preferred approach. I'm uncertain what the state of unit testing bash scripts is though

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants