Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ArPow build to build with current TFM #7674

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 30, 2021

Conversation

dseefeld
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has 3 items:

  1. Update the TFM to build with to only include net6.0. Source-build only builds with the current TFM.
  2. Remove a couple of test projects that don't need to be built for source-build.
  3. Update the path to runtime.json in Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Packaging.csproj. The version of Microsoft.NETCore.Platforms is defined via a PVP variable, but the search path was hardcoded to 2.1.0. If a different version of Microsoft.NETCore.Platforms is used (as happens in the source-build offline build), the path is incorrect.

@dseefeld dseefeld self-assigned this Jul 27, 2021
@dseefeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tmat, Can your review specifically for the change in src/Microsoft.DotNet.Arcade.Sdk/src/GenerateSourcePackageSourceLinkTargetsFile.cs? EscapeUriString() is obsolete with net6.0.

@dseefeld dseefeld force-pushed the updateForSourceBuild branch from 553484b to 17bd477 Compare August 30, 2021 15:41
@dseefeld dseefeld removed the request for review from tmat August 30, 2021 15:42
Because of the update to net6, implicit namespace support
is causing a conflict  when using Task as a base class.
@dseefeld dseefeld requested a review from missymessa August 30, 2021 22:48
Copy link
Member

@missymessa missymessa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM shipit

@dseefeld dseefeld merged commit f478e09 into dotnet:main Aug 30, 2021
@dseefeld dseefeld deleted the updateForSourceBuild branch August 30, 2021 23:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants