-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add New Item to Visual F# project has an incorrect tree structure #282
Comments
I do not repro using an internal VS drop from last week, or with VS 2015 preview. Does anyone else see this? |
Does not repro for me with fresh install of VS 2015 CTP6 + latest F# package. Per our hallway convo - I wonder if this is due to EnableOpenSource installation/development on your box? Maybe a tree path got horked while you were debugging that guy. |
I agree it was likely a configuration issue |
Bizarre, I just checked and have the same SQL stuff showing in the Visual F# Items bit (if you drill down, it's located in Data). I did upgrade from CTP4 or 5 to the RC - maybe this is something left over from then. |
Yeah I am actually seeing this now, too, after installing RC. |
This bug just won't go away... Right now, F# "new item" dialog looks correct with the default set of extensions that come with VS. However there appears to be some VS platform issue (or maybe setup bug on our side) whereby installing/uninstalling other extensions can cause our root node to disappear. I have confirmation from our team and the VS platform team that it's too late to make further changes for this, so we will live with it for now. I have a lead on a proper fix, will look at that for vNext. |
Decription:
When adding an item to an F# project the Item selector displays an incorrect tree structure Picture below.
The tree is:
Visual F# Items
Code
Visual F# Items
Code
Data
General
Clearly the first Visual F# Items and code are incorrect.
Repro:
Note: I am confident the fix will not be in the open part of the codebase, reporting here to avoid dupes.
Twitter: @codecutterman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: