Use alternative way of ignoring measures when detecting integral types #17040
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Followup to #16650. Fixes #17025.
typeEquivAux EraseMeasures
instead of callingstripMeasuresFromTy
and passing the result intotypeEquiv
when determining whether the range operator's type argument is an integral type. I originally assumed that the outcome would be the same for both approaches, but that appears not always to be the case (though it often is).Notes
(.. ..)
/start..step..finish
infor
-loops. Units of measure cannot currently be used at all with the range operator(..)
/start..finish
(due I think to its use ofLanguagePrimitives.GenericOne
, which also does not support units of measure; see, e.g., Allow units of measure in sequence ranges fsharp/fslang-suggestions#535, etc.).Checklist