-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CoreFX workflow docs #314
CoreFX workflow docs #314
Conversation
C:\Projects\corefx\src\System.Text.RegularExpressions\src> dotnet msbuild /p:ConfigurationGroup=Release | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Preventing Regressions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danmosemsft this is something new, I would like it to become a part of our perf culture (thinking of perf up-front and using tools to validate that)
|
||
**It's very important to validate the reported version numbers** to make sure that you are running the benchmarks using the versions you think that you are using. | ||
|
||
## Benchmarking new API |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stephentoub @ahsonkhan you both asked for that. I have tested that very carefully (I added new library to CoreFX, new type, new method to existing type) and everything works fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice write-up and functionality. Thanks.
@MarcoRossignoli @benaadams could you also please take a look? Your opinion is very important to me. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise, LGTM. Thanks for the write-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great start!
Comparer tool is fundamental to me, I think that will grow up quickly.
@stephentoub @ahsonkhan @MarcoRossignoli big thanks for the reviews! I have fixed all issues. @danmosemsft as soon as you provide your review and I fix the issues you find, we can merge it ;) |
I edited PR directly as I cannot make a PR against this PR in your fork.. feel free to revert. LGTM |
@danmosemsft I really like your changes, thanks! |
@stephentoub @danmosemsft @ahsonkhan this is my proposal for the new official CoreFX benchmarking workflow using performance repo.
The easiest way to view it is most probably via:
https://github.com/adamsitnik/performance/blob/corefxDocs/docs/benchmarking-workflow-corefx.md
PTAL ;)