Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use package name suffix for property names used inside AddGlobalAnalyzerConfigForPackage target #4489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2020

Conversation

mavasani
Copy link
Contributor

@mavasani mavasani commented Dec 3, 2020

This prevents clashes between property values when executed in context of different analyzer packages. Found this issue while dogfooding the NetAnalyzers package, when also referencing another analyzer package produced from this repo.

Use package name suffix for property names used inside `AddGlobalAnalyzerConfigForPackage` target. This prevents clashes between property values when executed in context of different analyzer packages.
@mavasani mavasani requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2020 14:31
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #4489 (389ac2f) into release/5.0.2xx (6a5ad25) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release/5.0.2xx    #4489   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            95.79%   95.79%           
================================================
  Files                 1164     1164           
  Lines               264445   264445           
  Branches             15976    15976           
================================================
+ Hits                253323   253330    +7     
+ Misses                9099     9098    -1     
+ Partials              2023     2017    -6     

@mavasani
Copy link
Contributor Author

mavasani commented Dec 3, 2020

Merging as this is a trivial change needed to unblock package release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant