Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement RS1041 (Compiler extensions should be implemented in assemblies targeting netstandard2.0) #7116
Implement RS1041 (Compiler extensions should be implemented in assemblies targeting netstandard2.0) #7116
Changes from all commits
48d4ebe
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The compiler already has the ability to pass MSBuild properties through as analyzer config options. By default we pass none. I'm starting to wonder if we should automatically pass a few ones like
<TargetFramework>
here. There are a number of analyzers that are interested in TFM. Looking at it that way doesn't require an type of semantic model access.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this done by project-system?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This repository has the ability to (and does in some cases) add such properties to the list of analyzer-exposed values. I can convert the analyzer to use this if desired. It could also be left as a follow-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it intentional to not check
CodeFixProvider
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
➡️ Yes. CodeFixProvider is an IDE feature, not a compiler feature.