Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Always try to register the EditorConfigDocumentOptionsProvider #40513
Always try to register the EditorConfigDocumentOptionsProvider #40513
Changes from 8 commits
ec43652
55acf88
e56bf8e
007b21b
ccdc697
25ea1db
ec1ce4d
505d448
f2d5c95
48bf4d9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JoeRobich I was able to verify the integration test failures from this PR locally, and the root cause seems to be this code path (from workspace constructor) can be invoked from a background thread, but fetching options can force loading of option persisters, which seem to require UI thread on creation. I moved this specific check
ShouldUseNativeEditorConfigSupport
from here down intoGetOptionsForDocumentAsync
below and then the tests pass locally. I think the correct long term solution here would be to remove the UI thread requirement from option persisters during their construction OR add functionality in GlobalOptionsService to be able to force UI thread before loading persisters. For now, this change should unblock us.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By the way, do we still need to support legacy editorconfig provider? I would be fine with us deleting it completely as well. Tagging @jasonmalinowski