Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CompareInfoIsSuffixTests.IsSuffix fails on Android #36631

Closed
steveisok opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 11 comments
Closed

CompareInfoIsSuffixTests.IsSuffix fails on Android #36631

steveisok opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 11 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@steveisok
Copy link
Member

This test fails on every arch with:

Assert.Equal() Failure
Expected: False
Actual:   True

StackTrace:

at System.Globalization.Tests.CompareInfoIsSuffixTests.IsSuffix(CompareInfo compareInfo, String source, String value, CompareOptions options, Boolean expected) in /Users/steve/dev/net5/droid-runtime/src/libraries/System.Globalization/tests/CompareInfo/CompareInfoTests.IsSuffix.cs:line 103
   at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture) in /Users/steve/dev/net5/droid-runtime/src/mono/netcore/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Reflection/RuntimeMethodInfo.cs:line 359
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 18, 2020

Tagging subscribers to this area: @tarekgh, @safern, @krwq
Notify danmosemsft if you want to be subscribed.

@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot Dotnet-GitSync-Bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label May 18, 2020
@safern
Copy link
Member

safern commented May 18, 2020

Thanks @steveisok for opening these issues. Given the number of tests and test suites we have would it make sense to open a meta issue per test assembly for each platform listing the individual tests and then we can close the issue once the test suite is green with no ActiveIssue against that issue?

@GrabYourPitchforks
Copy link
Member

Echoing Santi, I'd also prefer a single issue per assembly. Otherwise we run the risk of drowning out other issues in the repo.

Is there a particular CI output where we can see the failures? I pulled a random recent PR (#36633) and it seems like the Android CI legs are passing. Seeing the exact CI failures will help pinpoint what inputs were fed into these test theories at the time they failed.

@safern
Copy link
Member

safern commented May 18, 2020

it seems like the Android CI legs are passing. Seeing the exact CI failures will help pinpoint what inputs were fed into these test theories at the time they failed.

We’re not yet running tests on CI. We’re on the process on enabling that and we’ve been running them locally and gathering numbers in order to disable against issues and add a leg.

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented May 18, 2020

@steveisok if you don't mind, we'll consolidate the issues to be one issue per test suite. that is even will be easier for tracking and ensuring the whole suite is fixed.

@safern could you please go ahead and consolidate those?

@tarekgh tarekgh added test-run-core Test failures in .NET Core test runs and removed untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels May 18, 2020
@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented May 18, 2020

by the way, do we now use ICU on Android? or this work still in progress?

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented May 18, 2020

@safern
Copy link
Member

safern commented May 18, 2020

@safern could you please go ahead and consolidate those?

Yeah I’ll take care of it.

@safern
Copy link
Member

safern commented May 18, 2020

Closing in favor of: #36672

@safern safern closed this as completed May 18, 2020
@safern
Copy link
Member

safern commented May 18, 2020

by the way, do we now use ICU on Android?

I believe we use the one that ships as part of Android but I might be miss remembering, @akoeplinger should know better.

@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

Yes we use the ICU that is part of the Android system right now.

@marek-safar marek-safar added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Jun 24, 2020
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants