-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[wasm][aot] System.Runtime.Serialization.Xml.Tests - Maximum call stack size exceeded #61061
Comments
Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing Issue DetailsCreated based on the original issue - #59926 . The original issue is about a wasm specific failure:
The tests are currently disabled was wasm. Also (#59926 (comment)):
|
cc @vargaz |
This looks like a real stack overflow, there are 1000 native frames on the stack, the problem seems to be a dynamic method named
which is invoked recursively, causing execution to enter and exit the interpreter, adding a lot of extra frames and stack space. |
Disabling the DCS_DeeplyLinkedData () test on wasm fixes it:
|
#1417 has some history behind it |
Is this the only failing xml test so that we disable this and reenable the assembly? |
Yes, without it, it runs for me. |
Should this be |
This was disabled due to dotnet#59926, which was then tracked by dotnet#61061 . The stack overflow is due to one specific test though, and the rest of the tests can be enabled if we skip this one - `DCS_DeeplyLinkedData`.
Opened #68921 |
* Reenable `System.Runtime.Serialization.Xml.Tests` This was disabled due to #59926, which was then tracked by #61061 . The stack overflow is due to one specific test though, and the rest of the tests can be enabled if we skip this one - `DCS_DeeplyLinkedData`. * Disable the test with `SkipOnPlatform` instead, for wasm, as it is .. unlikely to be fixed (- vargaz).
Created based on the original issue - #59926 .
The original issue is about a wasm specific failure:
The tests are currently disabled for wasm (#60258).
Also (#59926 (comment)):
cc @pavelsavara
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: